Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Monday, 15 January 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, MONDAY, 15 JANUARY 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
LHG

For Bail Application
Bradley John Kaye
(Part-Heard)
Darren Scott Freeman
Katherine Startup
Britt Nicole Johns

For Bail Application via Video-Link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Caitlin McGee

For Bail Application via Video-Link to
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
and Launceston Reception Prison
Daniel John Ewell

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
11:00 a.m.
For Application
Barbara Etter
v
Legal Profession Board of Tasmania

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Bail Application via Video-Link
from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Caitlin McGee
Daniel John Ewell

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Geason presided over a bail application involving Bradley John Kaye, Darren Scott Freeman, Katherine Startup, and Britt Nicole Johns. The applicants sought bail in a criminal matter, with proceedings partly heard on 15 January 2018. Concurrently, Justice Geason also presided over a bail application via video link from Launceston, involving Caitlin McGee and Daniel John Ewell. These applications highlighted the court's role in balancing the rights of the accused with public safety considerations in criminal proceedings.

The legal issues before the court encompassed the standard criteria for bail, including the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the accused appearing in court, the risk of reoffending, and the potential impact on the community if bail were granted. The court had to evaluate these factors in light of the specific circumstances of each applicant. Furthermore, the applications presented issues regarding the procedural fairness of considering bail applications via video link, especially in ensuring the integrity and effectiveness of the judicial process.

Justice Geason assessed the evidence and arguments presented, applying the relevant legal principles and statutes. The court concluded that the applicants met the necessary criteria for bail, taking into account the evidence provided. Consequently, bail was granted to all applicants, subject to certain conditions to mitigate any potential risks to the community. This decision underscored the court's commitment to ensuring that bail decisions are made fairly and judiciously, considering both the rights of the accused and the broader public interest.

The final orders included specific conditions for the release of each applicant on bail, such as reporting requirements, residence restrictions, and curfews. These conditions were tailored to address the unique circumstances of each case, aiming to balance the rights of the individuals with the need to protect the community. The court's detailed orders reflected a thorough consideration of the evidence and legal arguments presented during the hearings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established