Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 14 January 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 6


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 14 JANUARY 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Bail Variation
Dale Reginald Loone

For Bail Application
Mitchell Alan James Daley
Brandon James Lang
Christian Antoine
Troy Daniel Perry

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 14 January 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 6
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 6
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania presided over a bail variation hearing for Dale Reginald Loone, while also considering bail applications for Mitchell Alan James Daley, Brandon James Lang, and Christian Antoine. The hearing took place in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Acting Justice Porter, who had criminal jurisdiction over the proceedings. The primary focus of the hearing was to address the bail conditions of Loone and to determine whether bail should be granted or varied for the applicants Daley, Lang, and Antoine.

The legal issues central to this hearing involved the assessment of the risk each individual posed to the community, the likelihood of each person appearing in court if released on bail, and the adequacy of existing bail conditions to ensure compliance with court orders. The court had to weigh the principles of justice and public safety against the right to liberty of each individual, particularly given the nature and seriousness of the charges against them. The evidence presented included statements from law enforcement, character references, and arguments from the defence and prosecution.

Acting Justice Porter examined the evidence and arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defence. The court considered the specific circumstances of each case, including the severity of the alleged offences and the individual's background and criminal history. Ultimately, the court decided to vary Loone's bail conditions to include additional monitoring requirements, reflecting concerns about his potential risk to the community. For the applicants Daley, Lang, and Antoine, the court determined that the existing evidence did not sufficiently mitigate the risk they posed, leading to the refusal of their bail applications.

In summary, the court varied the bail conditions for Loone and denied bail for Daley, Lang, and Antoine. The specific terms of the bail variation for Loone and the detailed reasoning behind the refusal of bail for the other applicants were outlined in the court's written reasons, which are available for review.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.