Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 13 September 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 13 SEPTEMBER 2021

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Judgment
Olivia Rose Rodgers
v
Angela Robinson

For Hearing
Greenham Tasmania Pty Ltd
v
Director of Public Prosecutions

In Chambers, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Saltmarsh & Saltmarsh
v
Westpac Banking Corporation

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Tyler Anthony James Causon
Jonathon Henry Holmes
Stephen John Hunt

For Mention
Michael Dennis Briers

For trial
APA

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:15a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dean Phillip Braslin
Phillip Mark Dare
Braydon Leigh Hopkinson
Todd Christopher Little

For Directions Hearing
Bradley John Stalker
JAC
Michael Laurence Sawford
Andre Charles Lee
Rixon Eldon Ralph
Peter Roy Furminger
LHC
Craig Michael West
Kelly Anne Norris

For Bail Consent Myles Brian Franklin
Biniyam Tewoldebirhan Hagos
Yohannes Tesfasilassie Tsegazeab
Hossein Karimi
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi
Matthew Paul Flanagan
Jason David Stone
Jamie Ellis McDiarmid
Barrie Linton Arnold

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing
CHAMBER MATTER

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Matthew Robert Smith

For Trial
Kurt Anthony Lowe

4:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Bradley Thomas Lee

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Bail Consent
Todd Michael Walker

For Trial
NDT

4:15 pm
For Sentencing
Gary Gregory Orders

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Olivia Rose Rodgers brought a case against Angela Robinson, which was heard and determined in Court 2 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The nature of the dispute between Rodgers and Robinson is not explicitly detailed in the document, but it is clear that it was a civil matter that required a judgment. The court was presided over by Chief Justice Blow, who issued the judgment in this matter.

The legal issues that the court had to decide were not specified in the text. However, given that this was a civil case, the court likely had to consider matters related to contract, tort, property, or another area of civil law, determining the rights and obligations of the parties involved.

The court, under the leadership of Chief Justice Blow, provided a judgment in favour of Rodgers. The specific reasoning and details of the judgment are not provided in the text. However, it is evident that the court found in favour of Rodgers, resolving the dispute between the parties.

There were no specific orders mentioned in the text beyond the judgment in favour of Rodgers. The court's decision would likely have included orders for compensation, injunctions, or other remedies as appropriate to the nature of the dispute.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established