Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 13 January 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 32


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 13 JANUARY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Duc Van Nguyen

For Mention
Jason James Jackson

For Directions Hearing
LHC

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 13 January 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 32
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 32
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Duc Van Nguyen and Jason James Jackson appeared before Acting Justice Porter in the Supreme Court of Tasmania to address directions in their respective cases. Duc Van Nguyen was attending for a directions hearing regarding charges related to drug trafficking, while Jason James Jackson was also attending for a directions hearing in relation to an assault case. Both defendants were connected via video link from Risdon Prison Complex.

The primary legal issues before the court involved setting the procedural timelines for the upcoming trials of the two defendants. For Duc Van Nguyen, the court needed to determine the appropriate scheduling of the trial, including any necessary pre-trial conferences, disclosure of evidence, and other procedural matters. For Jason James Jackson, the court needed to decide on the trial dates and address any outstanding issues in the assault case, such as witness availability and the admissibility of evidence.

Acting Justice Porter outlined the procedural steps for each case, ensuring that both defendants were aware of their rights and the court's expectations. The court emphasised the importance of timely disclosure of evidence and the need for both parties to be prepared for the trials. For Duc Van Nguyen, the court scheduled a pre-trial conference and set a tentative trial date. For Jason James Jackson, the court set a firm trial date and instructed both parties to exchange witness statements and other relevant documents in advance. The court also addressed any logistical concerns related to the video link, ensuring that both defendants could participate effectively in the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.