LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 12 SEPTEMBER 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Dylan Roy Bramich
Blake Cameron McPherson
Danny Edward Fry
Michelle Lee Arnott
Matthew John Davey
For Mention via video-link to
Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
A Witness
For Mention via video-link to
Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
A Witness
For Bail Consent
Tye Laurence Whitmore
For Trial
Luke Rogers
10:30 a.m.
For Trial
Jeffrey Mark Price
(Part Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Ashton Mitchell Gill
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jamie Leigh Feil
James Ernest Davey
For Trial
Alexander Peter Cooper
2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Tristan Jacob Hinds
Brendan Lee Jones
For Plea
Matthew Mark Parkinson
Aaron Robert Jones
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Mark Gilpin in his capacity as trustee of the Eriter Trust
v
Bonner Engineering Pty Ltd t/a Bonner Consulting Engineers
2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Christopher Benson and ors
v
Doloraine Pty Ltd and anor
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Luke James Reader
Jason Robert Burns
To Follow
For Special Hearing
Vicki Maree Fleming
4:15pm For Sentence
RGCB
Ricky Allen Fennelly
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Consent
MBG
For Trial
Christopher James Harris
(Part Heard)
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 12 September 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 193
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 193
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was to determine the appropriate procedural steps and directions for managing the ongoing litigation between the parties. This included the scheduling of further hearings, the exchange of evidence, and the resolution of any preliminary matters that needed to be addressed before the case could proceed to trial.
Associate Justice Holt provided detailed directions for the conduct of the case, outlining specific timelines for the exchange of documents, the filing of further statements, and the arrangement of a case management conference. The Justice emphasised the importance of efficient case management to ensure that the matter could progress fairly and expeditiously. The court also addressed issues concerning the scope of evidence to be presented and the need for any expert reports.
As a result of the directions hearing, the court issued orders that mandated specific actions from both parties within defined timeframes. These orders were designed to streamline the litigation process and facilitate an efficient resolution of the dispute.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.