Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday, 10 February 2020

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY, 10 FEBRUARY 2020

HOBART

NO LAW LIST FOR HOBART

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Mention
Christopher Leonard Brewer-Parker

For Trial
KPM
(Part-heard)

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Samantha Jayne Clarke

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Mention
DWW

For Trial
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos

12:30 p.m.
For Witness on Final Notice

4:00 p.m.
For Mention
RDH
Kurt Douglas Horton
Michael Andrew Smith
Christine Joy Radford
David Smith

In Chambers
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:10 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
RBR

In Chambers
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
James Timothy Casey
v
Janice May Loone

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of James Timothy Casey v Janice May Loone was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute was a civil matter, with Mr. Casey as the plaintiff and Ms. Loone as the defendant. Justice Pearce presided over the case. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly stated in the document, but it is a civil case requiring legal determination by the court.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide are not detailed in the provided text. However, in a civil case, the court would typically need to determine the validity of the plaintiff's claims, the applicable law, and whether the defendant is liable for any damages or other remedies sought by the plaintiff. The court may also need to decide on procedural matters, such as the admissibility of evidence or the appropriate course of action if one party fails to appear or comply with court orders.

The reasoning and outcome of the case are not provided in the text. In a civil case, the court would consider the evidence presented by both parties, apply relevant legal principles, and make a decision based on the facts and law. The court's decision could result in a judgment in favour of one party or the other, or it could involve the resolution of specific issues or disputes between the parties. Without further information, it is not possible to determine the specific outcome of this case.

If additional information becomes available, such as a written judgment or further details of the proceedings, it may be possible to provide a more detailed summary of the court's reasoning and outcome. However, based on the information provided, it is not possible to make any further comments on the case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established