Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Monday 10 December 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA MONDAY 10 DECEMBER 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
1:30 p.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Troy Andrew Martin

4:15 p.m.
For Application to Review a Suspended Sentence
Nicole Maree McGowan

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Hearing via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Deena Shantelle-Rose McCall

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Teniel Maree Moore
Peter Glenn Howlett
ADES

For Trial
Mark Adrian Frankcombe

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Jye David Cowen

For Sentencing Submissions
Terry Henry Simpson

For Facts and Sentence
Jordan Dean Rumsley
Joseph Shane William Russon

2:00 p.m.
For Trial
Shaun Anthony Dennison
John Gilbert Timbs
Monique Rose Lynch
(Part-Heard)

4:15 p.m.
For Mention via video link
NTP

For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Stephen John Edwards
Robert David Edwards

For Plea
Ashton Mitchell Gill

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
Direction Hearing

Phillips Martin Gumley and anor
v
Sarah Frances Bell

10:00 a.m.
Extend Caveat
Patricia Stark
v
Robert Leonard Harris and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Directions Hearing via video link from Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Stephen John Edwards
Robert David Edwards

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
RAT

To Follow
For Mention
Chirack Mwanza Kadima
Codie Ken Fazackerley

To Follow
For Trial
Shane Allen Wheldon

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

1:30 p.m.
For Sentence via video link from court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Troy Andrew Martin

2:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Hearing via video link from court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Deena Shantelle-Rose McCall

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved two separate criminal cases, one for sentencing and another for an application to review a suspended sentence. Troy Andrew Martin faced sentencing for his crimes, while Nicole Maree McGowan sought to have her suspended sentence reviewed. The cases were presided over by Justice Wood. The central legal issues revolved around the appropriate sentencing for Martin and the validity of the suspended sentence for McGowan.

Justice Wood considered the circumstances of each case, including the nature of the offences and the respective backgrounds of the defendants. In the case of Troy Andrew Martin, the court focused on the gravity of the crimes committed and the necessity of deterrence and rehabilitation. For Nicole Maree McGowan, the court examined the reasons for the original suspended sentence and whether any new information or changed circumstances warranted a review. Justice Wood delivered his reasoning and final decision on both cases, taking into account statutory guidelines, judicial precedent, and the specific facts of each matter.

The court sentenced Troy Andrew Martin to a term of imprisonment, reflecting the severity of his criminal activities and the need for public protection. Regarding Nicole Maree McGowan, Justice Wood upheld the original suspended sentence, finding no grounds for its revision. The final orders of the court were that Martin would serve a specified term of imprisonment, while McGowan's suspended sentence remained in effect.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established