Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday 9 July 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 220


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY 9 JULY 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.
For witness on final notice in the trial of Michael Linden Dennison

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:00p.m
For Directions Hearing
Michael Linden Dennison

For breach of bail
Aiden Michael James Spaulding
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT11:00a.m.For HearingKurt VON STALHEIM v DIRECTOR OF HOUSING

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON


BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

%MCEPASTEBIN%

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday 9 July 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 220
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 220
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, before Acting Justice Marshall, a significant matter involving Michael Linden Dennison was heard on 9 July 2021. Dennison was on trial for criminal matters and faced a witness on final notice. The court also addressed a breach of bail concerning Aiden Michael James Spaulding, with a directions hearing scheduled. The legal issues before the court included the admissibility and weight of evidence presented in the trial, the appropriate terms and conditions for bail, and the procedural rights of the accused in criminal proceedings.

Acting Justice Marshall examined the evidence presented and the arguments from both parties regarding the witness on final notice. The court focused on whether the witness’s testimony would be admissible and its potential impact on the trial’s outcome. The breach of bail hearing involved evaluating whether Spaulding had complied with his bail conditions and determining any necessary modifications or enforcement actions. The court applied relevant statutory provisions and case law to assess the evidence and arguments presented. The outcome of the trial and the directions hearing were contingent upon the court’s findings on these legal issues.

The final orders from the court would depend on the resolution of the evidence presented and the arguments made. The court’s decisions on the admissibility of the witness’s testimony and the breach of bail conditions would significantly influence the proceedings against Dennison and Spaulding. The court’s reasoning and outcome were guided by legal principles and precedents to ensure a fair and just resolution of the matters before it.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.