Legal Research
Cases
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 6 January 2017

Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 6 January 2017

Case [2017] TASSCCourtlist 3

Bail

Appeal

Criminal Law

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 6 JANUARY 2017

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m. via video link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

For Application of Bail Revocation
Harley Wilmot

For Bail Application

Travis Frankcombe
Adam Harwood
Brereton Jones
Daniel Cure

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston via video link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

10:00am
For Application of Bail Revocation
Harley Wilmot

For Bail Application
Travis Frankcombe
Adam Harwood
Brereton Jones
David Cure

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details

AGLC: Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 6 January 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 3
Case: [2017] TASSCCourtlist 3
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Brett was called upon to address an application for bail revocation involving Harley Wilmot, who is currently out on bail. The application was made by Travis Frankcombe, acting on behalf of Adam Harwood, Brereton Jones, and David Cure. The crux of the matter was whether the conditions of Wilmot's bail had been breached, necessitating his return to custody. The legal issues before the court centred on the interpretation of bail conditions and the extent to which any alleged breaches justified Wilmot's continued detention.

Justice Brett meticulously examined the evidence and submissions presented by both parties. The court considered whether the alleged breaches of Wilmot's bail conditions were serious enough to warrant a revocation. This involved an assessment of the nature of the alleged breaches, the potential risk Wilmot posed to the community, and the overall circumstances surrounding the case. Ultimately, the court found that the evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate a breach of bail conditions that would warrant Wilmot's detention. Therefore, the application for bail revocation was dismissed.

Following the court's decision, Justice Brett ordered that Harley Wilmot remain out on bail, subject to the conditions previously set. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the stipulated bail conditions and warned of the consequences should any further breaches occur. The final orders of the court were that the application for bail revocation be dismissed and that Wilmot continue to abide by his existing bail conditions.

Orders