Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 5 March 2021

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY 5 MARCH 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore the FULL COURT OF APPEAL
10:00a.m
TT Line Company Pty Ltd (ACN 061 996 174)
v
Rae Burrows

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Sentencing Submissions
Belinda Elizabeth Dobson

Court 7, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction9:30amFor Bail Application via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link to Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Directions Hearing
Tracey Lee BLOCKI v GABRIELE ANN HANSEN

For Directions Hearing
Allan Francis WILLIAMS and Jennifer WILLIAMS v Allan Francis WILLIAMS
and Patricia Lynette DEEGAN as Executors of the estate of EVA
GERALDINE WILLIAMS

For Directions Hearing
PERMANENT CUSTODIANS LIMITED v Tanya Maree MCKINNELL
11:00a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Dean RICHARDS v Steven TSIAKIS

12:00p.m.
For Directions Hearing via Telephone
Dong Jo SHIN and anor v Yong Tae CHO and anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston Before Justice GEASONCriminal Jurisdiction9:30amFor Bail Application via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

BURNIE

Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link to Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Directions Hearing
Tracey Lee BLOCKI v GABRIELE ANN HANSEN

For Directions Hearing
Allan Francis WILLIAMS and Jennifer WILLIAMS v Allan Francis WILLIAMS
and Patricia Lynette DEEGAN as Executors of the estate of EVA
GERALDINE WILLIAMS

For Directions Hearing
PERMANENT CUSTODIANS LIMITED v Tanya Maree MCKINNELL

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involved a dispute between TT Line Company Pty Ltd and Rae Burrows, which was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the text. The Full Court of Appeal presided over the case, with the hearing taking place in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide were not explicitly stated in the text. However, given that the case was heard by the Full Court of Appeal, it is likely that the court was required to review the decision of a lower court and determine whether there were any errors of law or fact that warranted a change in the outcome of the case.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the text. However, given that the case was heard by the Full Court of Appeal, it is likely that the court carefully considered the arguments presented by both parties and the relevant legal principles before reaching a decision.

No final orders were mentioned in the text. However, it is likely that the court made a decision that was binding on both parties and resolved the dispute between them. The outcome of the case may have had implications for similar cases in the future, depending on the legal issues that were decided by the court.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established