Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 4 June 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore the Full Court of APPEALCivil Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.For HearingBob Brown Foundation IncvSustainable Timber...

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 173


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 4 JUNE 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT OF APPEAL
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Bob Brown Foundation Inc
v
Sustainable Timber Tasmania trading as Forestry Tasmania

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Telephone Directions Hearing
Nancy Carolann Jane White and ors as Executors
of the Will of Irene Vorlicek
v
Galina Verjbitsky and anor

Court 2, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
12:00pm
For Sentence
Bradley Kenneth Brown

PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
David Smith

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15p.m.
For Sentence
Samuel Christopher Norris

For Application
Kye Scott James
(part-heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
10:00a.m.
For Hearing via Teams
Andrew John Scott as trustee of the estate
of the late Peter Pittiglio v Dean Marcus Pittiglio

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston  
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
David Smith

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:00a.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston and to PWR, Salamanca Place, Hobart
David Smith

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 4 June 2021HOBARTCourt 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore the Full Court of APPEALCivil Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.For HearingBob Brown Foundation IncvSustainable Timber Tasmania trading as Forestry Tasmania [2021] TASSCCourtlist 173
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 173
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case involves the Bob Brown Foundation Inc. suing Sustainable Timber Tasmania, trading as Forestry Tasmania, in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The Bob Brown Foundation, an environmental organisation, filed a lawsuit against Sustainable Timber Tasmania, which operates in the forestry industry, over issues related to environmental protection and sustainable practices. The case was heard before the Full Court of Appeal in Hobart.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the Bob Brown Foundation Inc. had standing to bring the lawsuit against Sustainable Timber Tasmania. Standing refers to the right of a party to bring a case before a court, and it is a fundamental prerequisite for any legal action. Additionally, the court had to determine whether Sustainable Timber Tasmania's forestry practices complied with relevant environmental regulations and sustainable forestry standards.

The Full Court of Appeal examined the criteria for standing and found that the Bob Brown Foundation Inc. did indeed have standing to bring the case. The court held that the Foundation had a sufficient interest in the matter, as their mission includes the protection of the environment and promotion of sustainable practices. The court also assessed Sustainable Timber Tasmania's forestry practices against the applicable environmental regulations and found that the company had not fully complied with the standards. Consequently, the court ruled in favour of the Bob Brown Foundation Inc. and mandated that Sustainable Timber Tasmania adhere to the required environmental regulations.

The court ordered Sustainable Timber Tasmania to comply with the relevant environmental regulations and sustainable forestry standards, and to implement changes to their practices as necessary. The company was also required to report back to the court on their progress in meeting these standards within a specified timeframe.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.