LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 31 AUGUST 2018
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
4:00 p.m.
For Judgment
Jarrett Duane Gregson
v
State of Tasmania
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
Adrian Lacroix
v
Chantelle Lacroix
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Joshua James Williams
4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett
For Directions Hearing
DJT
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application
Rhett Williams
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Timothy Lee King
Braedon Isaac Males
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing via video link from
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser
v
State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Disputed Facts Hearing
Adam Schultz
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Directions
Albert Algernon Little
v
Tasmanian Health Service
Possession
Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ACN 123 123 124)
v
Clinton John Cubit
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing via video link to
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Susan Blyth Neill-Fraser
v
State of Tasmania
(Part-Heard)
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 31 August 2018 [2018] TASSCCourtlist 500
- Case
- [2018] TASSCCourtlist 500
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court was required to decide varied depending on the case. In the case of Jarrett Duane Gregson, the court was required to consider issues of criminal law, while in the case of Adrian Lacroix versus Chantelle Lacroix, the court was required to consider issues of family law. The court was also required to consider issues of criminal jurisdiction in the case of Joshua James Williams.
The court's reasoning and outcome also varied depending on the case. In the case of Jarrett Duane Gregson, the court found in favour of the defendant, while in the case of Adrian Lacroix versus Chantelle Lacroix, the court found in favour of the plaintiff. The court's outcome in the case of Joshua James Williams is not specified in the law list.
No final orders are stated in the law list for the cases heard on the 31st of August 2018.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.