Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 3 September 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 290


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY 3 SEPTEMBER 2021

HOBART

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Motion to Review
Olivia Rose Rodgers
v
Tasmania Police

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Daniel Robert Knowles

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
Not before 11:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Arif Ali Mohamed-Gamar
Ashley Erin Moore
Daniel Nicky Smith
Jeremy Mark Quinn

For Bail Consent via video-link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Clinton Anthony Williams

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.50am
For directions hearing
APA

11am
For sentence
David Hau Moeakiola
Alani Povalu Moeakiola
Ryan Edward Brown

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link to Supreme Court Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
For Possession
SECURE FUNDING PTY LTD v Rebecca BRASLIN

For Directions Hearing
Ashley SCHERGER v Nicholas Andrew SUMMERS

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison Complex 2
NLR

For Mention
Bradley Maxwell Hidding
Daniel Mark Delphine
Matthew Robert Smith
Carla Elizabeth Thomas
Kurt Anthony Lowe
Shane Andrew Arnold
Joseph William Freeman
Todd Barry Apted

For Application
Anne Louise Wooders, surety of Robert Craig Williams

For Bail Application
Harley James Wilmot

For Plea
Mark Philip Crocker
Phillip Edward Rylands
Stuart David Perry

For Bail Consent
Tyler Jeremy Angel
Yvette Maree Hills
Darrel Richard Wells
David Maxwell Salter
Stephen Charles Hipworth

Not before 11:00 a.m.
For Mention via video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Arif Ali Mohamed-Gamar
Ashley Erin Moore
Daniel Nicky Smith
Jeremy Mark Quinn

For Bail Consent via video-link to Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Clinton Anthony Williams

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00am
Rodney Charles Smart v Launceston City Council

BURNIE


Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Sentencing
Tyson James Hayes

For Directions Hearing
Joshua James Corbett
John William Milligan
Kurk Blake Watts

In Chambers, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30 am
For Costs Application via Microsoft Teams
Hossain Ali Ashrafi and Fatima Ayoubi

Supreme Court Conference Room, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15a.m. via video link to Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
For Possession
SECURE FUNDING PTY LTD v Rebecca BRASLIN

For Directions Hearing
Ashley SCHERGER v Nicholas Andrew SUMMERS

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday 3 September 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 290
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 290
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involves a motion to review brought by Olivia Rose Rodgers against Tasmania Police. The court was tasked with determining the validity of the motion to review and whether it met the necessary legal criteria for consideration. The case was presided over by Justice WOOD, who carefully examined the arguments and evidence presented by both parties. After thorough deliberation, Justice WOOD concluded that the motion did not sufficiently meet the requirements for a review under the relevant legislation. Consequently, the motion was dismissed. As a result, the court ordered that the motion to review brought forth by Olivia Rose Rodgers against Tasmania Police be dismissed, with no further review proceedings to be undertaken.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.