Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 27 April 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY, 27 APRIL 2018

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Trial
WLS
(Part Heard)

For Mention
A Witness

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Trial
NRD
(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video-Link to Risdon Prison Complex
Andrew David Gilley
Christopher Craig Banks
Andrew Dennis Dare
Bradley Daniel Ford
James Stephen William Russon

For Directions Hearing via Video-Link to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Richard Francis Clarke

For Directions Hearing via Video-Link
JB

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Justin Andrew Leary

For Directions Hearing
Jason Samuel McCormick
Shaun Anthony Dennison
John Gilbert Timbs
Monique Rose Lynch
Royden Sydney Bevan Swan
Christopher John Worker
Natasha Lyn Davie
JSR
Shannon Myree Arnold
Emma May Wordsworth
William Proud
Brodie Alan Halton
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett
Wayne Andrew Fenton
Dallas John Eaves
Zeb Haas
Samuel John Everard

For Bail Consent
Craig Andrew Rickards
Zac Royden Webb

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Ashton Mitchell Gill

For Plea
Christopher Kenneth Cook

For Facts and Sentence
Desiree Josephine Hunt
Barbara Ann Kelty

2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application via Video-Link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison
Donita Marie Ahipene

For Bail Application
Robert Greig
Rebecca Lee Brooks

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence via Video-Link to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Charles John Rattray

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:30 a.m.
Enter Judgment
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
v
Annette Keating

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Sander Frith-Brown as Executor of the estate of the late Valerie Ruth James
v
Richard James and anor

LAUNCESTON

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial
Cody James Lee

12:45pm For Mention
A Witness

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Sentence via Video-Link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Charles John Rattray

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania delivered judgment in the case of Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Annette Keating, where the Deputy Commissioner of Taxation sought to recover unpaid taxes and penalties from the respondent. The case was heard via video link to Burnie and presided over by Associate Justice Holt. The central issue before the court was whether the respondent was liable for the unpaid taxes and penalties claimed by the Deputy Commissioner.

The court considered the relevant tax laws and the evidence presented to determine whether the respondent had indeed failed to pay the taxes and penalties in question. The Deputy Commissioner argued that the respondent was liable for the unpaid taxes and penalties based on the tax assessments issued. The respondent, on the other hand, contested the liability, arguing that she had fulfilled her tax obligations or that the assessments were incorrect. The court carefully examined the evidence and arguments from both parties before reaching its decision.

In its judgment, the court found in favour of the Deputy Commissioner. The court held that the respondent was liable for the unpaid taxes and penalties as claimed. The court found the respondent's arguments unconvincing and determined that the tax assessments were accurate and enforceable. Consequently, the court ordered the respondent to pay the unpaid taxes and penalties, along with interest, as claimed by the Deputy Commissioner. This decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and the applicable tax laws.

The final orders of the court included a judgment in favour of the Deputy Commissioner, with the respondent ordered to pay the unpaid taxes, penalties, and interest. The respondent was also directed to pay the Deputy Commissioner's costs of the proceedings. This decision underscores the importance of adhering to tax obligations and the consequences of failing to do so.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established