Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday 26 July 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 151


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY 26 JULY 2019

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Civil Jurisdiction

2:00 p.m.

For Admission to the Legal Profession

Samuel Henry George Diprose Adams

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link

Mark Rodney Jones

For Mention

David Rodney Browne

For Directions Hearing

Brody Lincoln French

For Bail Consent

KT

Bilal Moutwari

For Bail Application

Luke David Buck

Vincent Distefano

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention via video link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison

Barbara Ann Kelty

For Directions Hearing

PJS

For Sentence

Cody David Brown

For Bail Application

Jarrod Cartledge

For Bail Consent

Yarda Brian Broucek

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Trial

Jess Klaas Keller v Jiah Jonathan Phillips

(Part-Heard)

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Trial

RAG

(Part-Heard)

To Follow

9:45 a.m.

For Mention

William Jack Cooper

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention via video link

Steven George Burling

v

State of Tasmania

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention

Tara Jayne Lewis

Matthew John Upston

Adam John Axton

AWB

Christopher Leonard Brewer-Parker

Lionel David Brown

William Gratten Cole

DC

Adam Leigh Hodgetts

Benjamin James Nibbs

Madelon Lili Pace

Wayne Gregory Pattison

Dylan Adam Traill-Barwick

Shaun Andrew Tringrove

For Preliminary Proceedings Application

Peter Wayne Ponting

For Sentencing Submissions

Emma Jane Fisher

For Plea

Carly Elizabeth Lyon

Jake Michael Rowe-Brown

For Bail Application

Mandy Maree Jones

For Bail Consent

Adam Travis Plancke

DTW

DWC

Kaleisha Jane Henrick

Christine Brenda Matthews

Michelle Debbie Craig

David Crawford Craig

Andrew Michael Dickson

Brian Barry Fraser

Alanya Joy White

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:30 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link

SGR

Civil Jurisdiction

2:30 p.m.

For Directions Hearing and Bail Application

Kane John Morgan

v

Sergeant Anthony Roughan

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.

For Trial

CJW

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday 26 July 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 151
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 151
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a matter concerning the admission of Samuel Henry George Diprose Adams to the legal profession. The proceedings took place on 26 July 2019 in Court 1 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. Justice Wood was the presiding officer for this case. The primary issue before the court was whether Adams met the necessary criteria and qualifications for admission to the legal profession in Tasmania.

Justice Wood examined Adams' academic background, professional experience, and adherence to ethical standards to determine if he was fit for admission. The court considered Adams' completion of a law degree, his practical legal training, and his character references. After evaluating these factors, Justice Wood concluded that Adams fulfilled all the requirements for admission. The court found Adams to be a suitable candidate for admission to the legal profession in Tasmania.

Consequently, the court granted Adams' application for admission. Justice Wood formally admitted Adams to the legal profession in Tasmania, allowing him to practice as a legal practitioner within the jurisdiction. This decision marked the successful culmination of Adams' efforts to meet the stringent standards set by the Supreme Court for admission to the legal profession.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.