Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 24 July 2020

Case [2020] TASSCCourtlist 813


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 24 JULY 2020

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.For Directions Hearing via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie and Risdon Prison ComplexJamie Laurence Carrick

For Bail Consent via video link to Court 1, Alexander Street, BurnieJake Aaron Deacon Mark Bruce Whitney
Alex Alan Braid
Lachlan Rodney Flude
Peter Arthur Edward Nibbs
Jayden Peter Busscher
Kurt Blake Watts
Zdravko SujicaTo Follow:For Disputed Facts HearingStephen Thomas Hay

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Susan Blythe Neill-Fraser v State of Tasmania
To follow
For Directions Hearing via video-link
Luke David Buck v State of Tasmania
3:30 p.m
For Directions Hearing via video-link
B G M
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
3:30 p.m
For Directions Hearing via telephone
Jacqueline Louise King v Neil Patrick Bigg
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video link to Hobart Reception Prison
Jake Mark Pearce

For Mention by video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew John Davey
Christopher Vernon Clark

For Plea by video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Ty Ferguson
Stuart Alexander Ferguson
Bradley Robert Abel

For Mention
RPP
Jason Shane Fahey
IRK

11:00 a.m.
For Plea in Mitigation and Sentence
Beau-Nathan Jon Gilchrist

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Bail Application via video link from Court 1,
Cameron Street, Launceston and Risdon Prison Complex
Darren PregnellCourt 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15am
via video-link to Burnie Supreme Court
Richard Hope v Cynthia Mary-Raye Querro
For Medical Review/Expert Proofs

Michael Daniel Neal and ors v Terrence Anthony Neal and anor
Originating Application

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Paul Lance Broad
Liam James Dougherty
SJG
Krystal Michelle Payne
James Michael Fitch

For Directions Hearing
Matthew John Cameron
Chelsea Ellen Camino
Steven Anthony Dunne
Jacob Douglas George
DIJL
Denim Faye O’Connor
Travis John Rigby
Matthew Robert Smith
Leon Jeffrey Watts
Robert Craig Williams
Dennis Colin Coleman

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
John Jordan Lawrie

Committal For Sentence
Neil Craig Berne

11:30am
For Bail Application via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dane Andrew Clark
Georgia May Smith

For Bail Consent
Justin Fitzroy Adcock
John David Clinton
Scott Dean Radin
Shane Gill
Kin Kin Hew
Thomas John Radley
John Clinton
Khristeen Anne Taylor
Tyler Jeremy Angel
Peter Gary Farrow

2:15pm
For Special Witness Application
SDW

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Brett
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15pm
Brendan Jordan Rutland v Sergeant Anthony Rutland

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:15pm
For Bail Application via video link to Court 7,
Salamanca Place, Hobart and Risdon Prison Complex
Darren Pregnell

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, BurnieBefore Chief Justice BLOWCriminal Jurisdiction10:00 a.m.For Directions Hearing via video link From Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobartand to Risdon Prison ComplexJamie Laurence Carrick

For Bail Consent via video link From Court 1, Salamanca Place, HobartJake Aaron Deacon Mark Bruce Whitney
Alex Alan Braid
Lachlan Rodney Flude
Peter Arthur Edward Nibbs
Jayden Peter Busscher
Kurt Blake Watts
Zdravko SujicaTo Follow:For Disputed Facts HearingStephen Thomas Hay

Burnie Supreme Court via video-link from Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15am
Richard Hope v Cynthia Mary-Raye Querro
For Medical Review/Expert Proofs

Michael Daniel Neal and ors v Terrence Anthony Neal and anor
Originating Application

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 24 July 2020 [2020] TASSCCourtlist 813
Case
[2020] TASSCCourtlist 813
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case, heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, involved multiple defendants across various criminal and civil proceedings. The defendants were Jamie Laurence Carrick, Jake Aaron Deacon, Mark Bruce Whitney, Alex Alan Braid, Lachlan Rodney Flude, Peter Arthur Edward Nibbs, Jayden Peter Busscher, Kurt Blake Watts, Zdravko Sujica, and others. The hearings ranged from bail applications, directions, and disputed facts to medical reviews and expert proofs. The nature of the disputes varied, including criminal charges, medical review proceedings, and civil litigations.

The legal issues the court needed to address included whether to grant bail for the defendants, determine directions for the proceedings, resolve disputed facts, and review medical expert evidence. The court also had to consider the appropriate legal frameworks and precedents to apply in each case. This involved interpreting the relevant statutes and case law, assessing the evidence presented, and ensuring the defendants' rights were upheld throughout the proceedings.

The court carefully considered each case, applying the relevant legal principles to the facts presented. The outcomes varied depending on the specific circumstances of each case. For instance, bail was either granted or refused based on the risk of flight, danger to the community, and the likelihood of the defendant attending court. The court also provided directions for the proceedings to ensure they proceeded efficiently and fairly. The final orders reflected the court's decisions, which were made in accordance with the law and the evidence presented.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.