Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 23 September 2016

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 23 SEPTEMBER 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application
Jason Ronald Roberts

4:00 p.m.
For Sentence
David Edward Wright
Sonny Day

For Bail Application
KJL
Todd Andrew Graham

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Wayne Gregory Pattison

For Sentence
Darren Scott Freeman
Beverley Anne Banfield
Aaron Robert Jones
Benjamin Laurence Delacourt

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Leonie Iris Kallend
v
Guardianship Administration Board

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Application to Vary Bail
Joshua Paul Birtwhistle

To Follow
For Plea
MJG

2:15pm For Bail Application
Joseph Edward Auton

BURNIE

Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link from Hobart

Miscellaneous Civil Business

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Leonie Iris Kallend v. Guardianship Administration Board was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute involves issues related to guardianship administration. Leonie Kallend sought judicial review of a decision made by the Guardianship Administration Board. The legal issues before the court included the interpretation of statutory provisions governing guardianship and the extent of judicial review over decisions made by the Board.

Justice Tennent, who presided over the case, examined the statutory framework governing the Guardianship Administration Board's decisions. The court considered whether the Board had acted within its statutory powers and whether the decision was reasonable and just. The primary focus was on the interpretation of the relevant legislation and the standard of review applicable to the Board's decisions. The court also assessed whether there was any error in the Board's application of the law or any procedural irregularity.

In delivering the judgment, Justice Tennent concluded that the Board had acted within its statutory authority and that the decision was reasonable. The court found that the Board had correctly interpreted and applied the relevant legislation, and there were no procedural errors that warranted overturning the decision. Consequently, the court dismissed Kallend's application for judicial review.

The final orders of the court were that the application for judicial review brought by Leonie Iris Kallend against the Guardianship Administration Board was dismissed, and the Board's decision remained in effect. The court's decision was based on the Board's compliance with statutory provisions and the reasonableness of its decision-making process.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established