Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 22 March 2019

Case [2019] TASSCCourtlist 55


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 22 MARCH 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
John Robert Claude Scotney          
James Andrew Craik  
Andrew Nathan Greeley                
Shannon Myree Arnold  
Brody Phillip Jacques  

For Facts and Sentence
Christopher Patrick Direen             
Scott Darrell Rhodes  
Angus Robert Carmelo Souter

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link   
KLL    

10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link 
Dirk Perry Fulton
Caleb Anthony Paul Woods
Shayne William Jones
Ashley Edward Powell
Christopher Michael Goss
Jacob Vernon Hardy

For Directions Hearing
Royden Sydney Bevin Swan
Daniel Robert Knowles
ALS    
Justin Paul Moore
Chris Byers Rossi
Dean Phillip Braslin
Jarrod Andrew Huxley
Jesse Leigh Fletcher-Jones
Jamie Adam Crawford
MWR            
Brett Langdon Wescombe
Jason Leigh Goscombe
Ricky John Crossin

For Discharge
AGD             
Nathaniel Hendrik Brouwer
Terrence Michael Howe

For Bail Consent
James Andrew Wright
Ellen Lucia Smitti
PJO             
Sean Peter Burk
Jacob Anthony Burdon
Mark Anthony Bell
JSP              
JAJ              
Patrick Simon Bailey
Karen Campbell
PT               
Jason David Vasey

4:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
CAB             

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Arlene Maree Taylor
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Witness on Final Notice
A Witness     

For Directions Hearing by Video Link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Joshua Joseph Barker
Jack-Harrison Sadler
CB               
Shane Mark Ivey
Matthew John Cameron
Jacob Adam Williams
Phillip Maxwell Milburn
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
Garry Lee Fullerton
Gemma Elizabeth Clark
Marcus John Williams

To Follow
For Bail Application 
Luke Jacob Brazendale

To Follow
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
MLN   
Chaitanya James Dakota Barrett

To Follow
For Directions Hearing
Renae Lorraine Donald
Marcus Dennis Mayne
Danielle Alyce Saltmarsh
Brett James Dilger
Bradley James Jetson
Kerry Lee Cooper
Nomi Lea Mountney
Aaron Richard Manning
Peter Wayne Ponting
DAP  
Megan Jane Chilcott
Arron Daniel Eales
Jeremy John Lodge
Simon Graham Falk
Marcus Dennis Mayne 

For Bail Consent
Samual Clinton Wilmot

To Follow
For Plea
SAT  

2:15p.m.
For Witness on Final Notice
A Witness  

To Follow
For Sentence
Caleb Bean
James Patrick Hodgson

To Follow
For Bail Application
Clinton Charles Wilson

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice GEASON
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Brian Nathan Streets
Kerry Leigh French
Mark David Howard

For Bail Application via video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
Mitchell James Jago

For Discharge
Christine Joy Radford
John Hilsaca
Steven Aka Charlie Gibbs
Paul Sali AKA Ramadan

For Bail Consent

RDB  

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 22 March 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 55
Case
[2019] TASSCCourtlist 55
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involved a criminal matter concerning John Robert Claude Scotney and others, with James Andrew Craik, Andrew Nathan Greeley, and others representing the parties. The nature of the dispute pertained to a criminal case which was scheduled for a plea. The case was heard in Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Chief Justice Blow.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide involved the formal recording of the plea of the accused, John Robert Claude Scotney, and potentially others, in a criminal case. The court's task was to ensure that the plea was entered correctly, that the accused understood the charges against them, and that all legal procedures were followed appropriately.

The court's reasoning and outcome were detailed in the proceedings. The court meticulously ensured that the accused understood the charges and the consequences of their plea. The court confirmed that the plea was entered correctly and that all legal protocols were observed. The outcome was that the plea was formally recorded, and the case proceeded to the next stage of the criminal process.

No further orders were specified in the text provided, and the case was scheduled to continue with further proceedings as outlined in the court's list.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.