Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 21 June 2019 - [2019] TASSCCourtlist 127

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, FRIDAY, 21 JUNE 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL

Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15 p.m.

For Judgment

RJH

State of Tasmania

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Trial

2:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing

Chauncy Aaron Bell

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Directions Hearing

Letita Ann Ware

For Directions Hearing via video link

Joshua George Hector Clark

Joshua Robin Oakley

Robert Raymond Kaye

Craig John Smith

For Directions Hearing

Nicholas John Barrett

Christopher James Brown

Nicole Louise Cooper

Jarrod Troy Mayne

Johnny David Jones

WACC

Michael Eddie French

Jarrod James Cartledge

Leigh Douglas Monks

Jason Shane Fahey

Georgina Elizabeth Carter

Jordan Mark O’Brien

HFR

ZAD

A Witness

For Bail Consent

Dimitrios Eli Howell

Karin Eiley Rubenach

Royden Sydney Bevin Swan

Marcus Alexander Clayton

Bilal Moutwari

Peter John O’Neill

CBP

Todd Andrew Tatnell

11:00 a.m.

For Bail Application

Michael Thomas Jones

Tamara Lee Clements

11:30 a.m.

For Bail Application

Sean Patrick Mahoney

2:15 p.m.

For Application

NMM

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

12:00 p.m.

For Bail Application

Tye Paul Silver

(Part-Heard)

To follow

For Bail Application

Jake Samuel Pepper-Casey

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice GEASON

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

For Trial (Part-Heard)

Carley Anne Watkins

Leigh Reginald Dobson

Samuel James Franklin

By Video Link from Court 3 Hobart to

Court 2 Burnie

Before Associate Justice HOLT

9.15am

Miscellaneous Civil Business

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

10.30am

Hearing – Originating Application

Andrew John Keehn

Anne Rhonda Kennedy

(as executor of the estate of the late John George Kennedy)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:30a.m.

For Mention

Tayla Ebony Stevenson

Samuel Joseph Clark

10:00a.m.

For Trial

Mark Rodney Jones

(Part Heard)

4:15p.m.

For Bail Application

Stephen George Rock

Daniel Paul Carr

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Application to Vary Bail

Nathan Baden Roy Whelan

For Bail Consent

Rebecca Dorothy Baker

12:00 p.m.

For Preliminary Proceedings Application

Dannielle Joy Cope

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Details

AGLC: Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Friday, 21 June 2019 [2019] TASSCCourtlist 127
Case: [2019] TASSCCourtlist 127
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was heard on 21 June 2019, involving RJH versus the State of Tasmania. The dispute pertains to criminal charges brought against RJH, and the matter was heard in Court 7 at Salamanca Place, Hobart. The court was tasked with addressing the legal issues arising from the criminal proceedings against RJH, focusing on the evidence presented, the application of criminal law, and the appropriate legal outcomes based on the facts of the case.

The court examined several key legal issues, including the admissibility of certain evidence, the interpretation of criminal statutes relevant to the charges, and the procedural fairness of the trial process. The arguments centered on whether the evidence provided by the prosecution was sufficient to meet the burden of proof and whether there were any procedural errors that could affect the validity of the trial. Additionally, the court considered defence arguments regarding the interpretation of specific criminal laws and their application to the facts of the case.

After reviewing the evidence and legal arguments, the court found that the prosecution had successfully met the burden of proof and that there were no procedural errors that would invalidate the trial. The court ruled in favor of the State of Tasmania, confirming the criminal charges against RJH. The reasoning focused on the sufficiency of the evidence presented and the correct application of the relevant criminal laws. The court's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence, the applicable legal principles, and the procedural fairness of the trial.

The final orders of the court included the confirmation of the criminal charges against RJH and the continuation of the legal process as per the court's directions. The decision was communicated in a detailed written judgment, outlining the court's reasoning and the legal basis for its decision.

Orders