Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 21 February 2020

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 21 FEBRUARY 2020

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:45 a.m.
For Judgment
Cameron James Riley
v
State of Tasmania

21 February 2020
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Trial
Wayne Lea Holt
v
Carol Laura William

21 February 2020
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
Johnny David Jones

For Directions Hearing via video-link
B G M

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.
For Mention
Christopher Vernon Clark

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video-link to
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Joshua Leigh Jeffrey

For Mention
Stephen Thomas Hay
Shaun Brodie Parremore
Shaun Edward Hodges

For Bail Consent
Damien Paul Lynch

For Facts and Sentence
Matthew Stanley Scriber

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Deryck John Lockwood

For Sentence by video-link to
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Michael Kenneth Riley

3:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Shaaqiil Fontaine

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Hearing via video link to Court 2,
Cameron Street, Launceston
Sven Olaf Gunnarsson-Wiener
v
Lyndon Julian Parnell Iles on behalf of Department
of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Argument
Darren Ward Gale

12:00 p.m.
For For Argument
DJT

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
via video link to Alexander Street Burnie
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15 am
Phillip Basham
v Legal Profession Disciplinary Tribunal
Interlocutory Application – Extension of Time

Dawn Vallance v Arvind Dubey
Directions

James McClelland Swanson Foran v Thomas Eden Hilder
Directions

Jaiden Adam Targett v Anaconda Group Pty Ltd
as trustee for Anaconda Unit Trust
Directions

Bevan William Turnbull v Teresita Savilla Allie
Directions Hearing / Mediation

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124)
v Justin John Bronson
Possession

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
2:15pm
The Honourable Matthew Groom, Minister
Administering the National Parks and
Reserves Management Act 2002 v
Eco-Geo International Pty Ltd
Amend Title

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Directions By Video Link
WAHR
IMN
Natalie Maher
Carly Elizabeth Lyon
Shannon Louise Brown
Thomas James Aliano
Stephen James Williams
Curtly James Hodge
Chirack Mwanza Kadima

For Mention
Bianca Elizabeth Pyke
Arthur ProglyRicky Lee Smith-Towns
Mark Richard Nicholas
Jake Christopher Morgan
SJH
Russell Peter Haworth
Matthew John Cameron
Stacey Dawn Lambert
Kenneth Alwyn Herbert
Luke Anthony Joseph Burston
Dylan Adam Traill-Barwick
Glenn William Barnard
Colin Harvey Templar

To Follow:
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Jason Grey

To Follow:
For Plea
JMB
WAR
Kristy Louise Ackroyd

To Follow:
For Bail Consent
Kaide Raymond Dane Baker
William Gratten Cole
DIJL

2:15pm
For Mention
Damien Neil Smart

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Hearing via video link from Court 1,
Salamanca Place, Hobart
Sven Olaf Gunnarsson-Wiener
v
Lyndon Julian Parnell Iles on behalf of Department of
Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link to Risdon Prison Complex
Dylan James Shaw

For Directions Hearing
Aidan Jack Binnie
ED
NDT
Lachlan Rodney Flude
Alex Alan Braid
LEB
Dylan Kenneth Donald Meares

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Jake Aaron Deacon
JSB

For Special Hearing
RBR

For Bail Consent
Jason Paul Fitzpatrick
DVM Luke Matthew AshmanHJRKayden John Bramich
Troy Adam Stevens
Andrew Simon Stubbs
Benjamin Luke CopplemanThomas Leslie Rennison
Not Before 10:20 a.m.
For Trial
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos
(part-heard)

Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention by video-link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Joshua Leigh Jeffrey

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence by video-link from
Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Michael Kenneth Riley

Alexander Street, Burnie
via video link from Court 3,
Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
9:15 am
Phillip Basham
v Legal Profession Disciplinary Tribunal
Interlocutory Application – Extension of Time

Dawn Vallance v Arvind Dubey
Directions

James McClelland Swanson Foran v Thomas Eden Hilder
Directions

Jaiden Adam Targett v Anaconda Group Pty Ltd
as trustee for Anaconda Unit Trust
Directions

Bevan William Turnbull v Teresita Savilla Allie
Directions Hearing / Mediation

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124)
v Justin John Bronson
Possession

Cameron James Riley is the appellant in a case against the State of Tasmania, which was heard by the Supreme Court of Tasmania on February 21, 2020. The nature of the dispute pertains to a criminal matter, with the appellant contesting an aspect of his criminal conviction or sentence. The Court of Criminal Appeal was responsible for hearing the appeal, with Justice WOOD presiding over the proceedings.

The legal issues before the court involved the appellant challenging certain aspects of his criminal conviction or sentence, although the specific grounds for appeal are not detailed in the case summary. The court was required to determine whether the appellant's appeal had merit and whether any errors in the original trial or sentencing process warranted a revision of the conviction or sentence.

In delivering the judgment, the court thoroughly examined the appellant's grounds for appeal and considered the relevant legal principles and authorities. After careful deliberation, the court found that the appellant's appeal was without merit, and the original conviction and sentence were upheld. The court did not identify any errors in the original trial or sentencing process that would necessitate a revision of the appellant's conviction or sentence.

No final orders were provided in the case summary, but typically, the court would confirm the original conviction and sentence in its judgment. The appellant may have the option to further appeal the decision to a higher court, such as the High Court of Australia, if he believes that a significant legal error was made in the Court of Criminal Appeal's judgment.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established