Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 19 November 2021

Case [2021] TASSCCourtlist 376


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 19 NOVEMBER 2021

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before the Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing

Anthony Ray Laoumtzis

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before the Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

For Application  

Damian Steven Matthews

Adrian Alwyn Pickett

Craig John Smith

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15pm

For Application via video-link from Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Oliver Felix Kulinski

Friday 19 November 2021

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am

For Disputed Facts Hearing

JCG    

10.00am

For Sentencing Submissions

Scott Andrew Francis Jones

2.15pm

For Mention

AJC    

For Directions Hearing via video-link to Burnie Supreme Court

GDG  

LAUNCESTON

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Criminal Jurisdiction

2:15pm

For Application via video-link to Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Oliver Felix Kulinski

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE

Civil Jurisdiction

4:15pm

For Admission to the Legal Profession

Harrison Albert Fawcett

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Acting Justice PORTER

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am

For Directions Hearing

Brody Reginald Costello

To Follow

For Mention by video-link

Darrin Thomas Bond

NLR

Lonewolf Brent Shayne Mansell

Luke Jack Walker

Wade Alan Mackenzie

Stephen James Williams

To Follow

For Directions Hearing

Russel Peter Haworth

Jane Maree Blundstone

Janelle Maree McConnon

Yvette Maree Hills

Michelle Anne Hodge

Aaron Neil Wesley

James John Williams

To Follow

For Application

Patrick Charles Curbishley

To Follow

For Bail Consent

Timothy James Connell

Shanelle Renee Delaney

Todd Barry Apted

Monique Clark

Candida Alice Smedley

Michael Brian Snare

Darron John Baker

Not Before 10:30am

For Plea

Kylie Ann Durban

Joshua Lee Scott

David Jonathon Holmyard

MJS

Carla Elizabeth Thomas

Dayne John Robertson

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00a.m.

For Directions Hearing

Danielle Joy Cope     

For Trial

SRR

(Part-heard)

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

For Directions Hearing via video-link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

GDG  

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 19 November 2021 [2021] TASSCCourtlist 376
Case
[2021] TASSCCourtlist 376
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a number of criminal matters on 19 November 2021. Justice Wood presided over a directions hearing for Anthony Ray Laoumtzis, while Justice Estcourt dealt with an application from Damian Steven Matthews, Adrian Alwyn Pickett, and Craig John Smith. Justice Pearce heard an application from Oliver Felix Kulinski via video link from Launceston and presided over a sentencing hearing for Scott Andrew Francis Jones. In Launceston, Justice Pearce also heard an application from Oliver Felix Kulinski via video link and an admission to the legal profession for Harrison Albert Fawcett. Acting Justice Porter heard a directions hearing for Brody Reginald Costello.

The legal issues before the court included directions in criminal proceedings, applications for bail or consent, and sentencing submissions. The court had to decide on the appropriate course of action in each case, considering the specifics of the charges and the circumstances of the defendants. Sentencing submissions required a review of the evidence and applicable legal principles to determine an appropriate penalty.

The court provided directions for the continuation of the cases, granted or denied bail, and heard submissions on sentencing. Justice Wood, Justice Estcourt, Justice Pearce, and Acting Justice Porter all provided detailed rulings and explanations for their decisions, ensuring that the legal process was followed and the rights of the defendants were protected.

The final orders varied for each case, with some defendants receiving directions for further hearings, others being granted or denied bail, and some receiving sentencing decisions. The court ensured that each case was handled with due process and consideration of the individual circumstances.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.