Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 18 November 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 250


LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 18 NOVEMBER 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Ryan Michael Zmendak
Emma May Wordsworth
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith

For Trial
Jamie Leigh Feil
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Braedon Isaac Males
Trisha Jean Gordon
Gary Matthews

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application for Breach of Community Service Order
Julie Louise Rowbottom

To Follow
For Bail Application
Corey French

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Hendrik Dikkenberg
(Part-Heard)

To Follow
For Bail Application
Andrew James Dand
Steven Craig Murtagh

Court 2, Salamanca Place 
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Nicholas Cashmore Dennis & Anor
v
Telfer Anne Dennis & Ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
Directions Hearings by video link
Samuel Mulholland
v
The State of Tasmania

Marco Rusterholz
v
The State of Tasmania

Leon Chance
v
The State of Tasmania

Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
William von Stieglitz and anor
v
Kenneth Targett and anor

Kenneth Targett as Executor of the Estate
of the late Charles von Stieglitz and anor
v
Michael von Stieglitz and ors

Michael von Stieglitz and ors
v
Kenneth Targett and John Green (Executors of
the Will of Charles von Stieglitz) and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Basha Inquiry
Shane Mark Ivey

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Breach Application
JTE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 18 November 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 250
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 250
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Nicholas Cashmore Dennis and another versus Telfer Anne Dennis and others was heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute concerns a claim for damages and an account of profits arising from the sale of a property. The court was required to determine the validity of the claim and, if valid, the amount of damages and profits that should be awarded. The legal issues included the interpretation of the contract between the parties, the calculation of damages, and the assessment of profits.

The court considered the evidence and submissions from both parties and applied relevant principles of contract law and equity. It was found that the contract was valid and that the defendant had breached it. The court determined that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for the breach and ordered the defendant to account for the profits made from the sale of the property. The court also considered the appropriate amount of damages and profits, taking into account the evidence and submissions from both parties.

The final orders of the court included a declaration that the contract was valid, an order for the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff, and an order for the defendant to account for the profits made from the sale of the property. The court also made orders regarding the costs of the proceedings. The decision provides guidance on the interpretation of contracts and the calculation of damages and profits in similar cases.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.