LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 18 NOVEMBER 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Ryan Michael Zmendak
Emma May Wordsworth
Derek Leslie Graeme Smith
For Trial
Jamie Leigh Feil
(Part-Heard)
4:00 p.m.
For Bail Application
Braedon Isaac Males
Trisha Jean Gordon
Gary Matthews
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Application for Breach of Community Service Order
Julie Louise Rowbottom
To Follow
For Bail Application
Corey French
2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
Hendrik Dikkenberg
(Part-Heard)
To Follow
For Bail Application
Andrew James Dand
Steven Craig Murtagh
Court 2, Salamanca Place
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Nicholas Cashmore Dennis & Anor
v
Telfer Anne Dennis & Ors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
Directions Hearings by video link
Samuel Mulholland
v
The State of Tasmania
Marco Rusterholz
v
The State of Tasmania
Leon Chance
v
The State of Tasmania
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
Directions Hearing by Telephone
William von Stieglitz and anor
v
Kenneth Targett and anor
Kenneth Targett as Executor of the Estate
of the late Charles von Stieglitz and anor
v
Michael von Stieglitz and ors
Michael von Stieglitz and ors
v
Kenneth Targett and John Green (Executors of
the Will of Charles von Stieglitz) and ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Basha Inquiry
Shane Mark Ivey
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Brett
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Breach Application
JTE
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 18 November 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 250
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 250
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the evidence and submissions from both parties and applied relevant principles of contract law and equity. It was found that the contract was valid and that the defendant had breached it. The court determined that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for the breach and ordered the defendant to account for the profits made from the sale of the property. The court also considered the appropriate amount of damages and profits, taking into account the evidence and submissions from both parties.
The final orders of the court included a declaration that the contract was valid, an order for the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff, and an order for the defendant to account for the profits made from the sale of the property. The court also made orders regarding the costs of the proceedings. The decision provides guidance on the interpretation of contracts and the calculation of damages and profits in similar cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.