Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 16 August 2019

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 16 AUGUST 2019

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Chief Justice BLOW

Civil Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Judgment

Anthony Di Benedetto

Satchithananthan Chelliah

For Hearing

Legal Profession Board of Tasmania

and In the Matter of an Australian Lawyer

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Civil Jurisdiction

2:15 p.m.

For Trial

Jess Klaas Keller v Jiah Jonathan Phillips

(Part-heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice Holt

9.15 am video link to Court 2,

Alexander Street, Burnie

Miscellaneous Civil Business

10.30 am

For hearing (amend statement of claim)

Michael John Coleman

v David Arthur Cuthbertson

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Bradley Mark Riley

Joshua Josef Barker

John Gregory Peck

For Sentencing Submissions via video link to

Risdon Prison Complex and Salamanca Place, Hobart

Aydain Kane House

For Mention via video link to Mary Hutchinson Women’s Prison

Tara Jayne Lewis

For Mention

Edward Richards

Skye Maree Parker

For Sentencing Submissions

Aaron James Lee

For Mention via video link to Salamanca Place, Hobart

Jesse Elijah Hall

For Plea in Mitigation via video link to Salamanca Place, Hobart

KSM

For Plea

Damien Charles Knowles

2:15 p.m.

For Mention via video link to Risdon Prison Complex

Brady Leigh Wheldon-Tynan

BURNIE

Court 2, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Associate Justice Holt

9.15 am video link from Court 3,

Salamanca Place, Hobart

Miscellaneous Civil Business

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania, sitting in Hobart, was presented with a case involving Anthony Di Benedetto and Satchithananthan Chelliah. The nature of the dispute appears to be a civil matter, although the specifics of the dispute are not detailed in the extract. Another case, Jess Klaas Keller v Jiah Jonathan Phillips, was part-heard in the same court, suggesting a complex or ongoing civil litigation matter. Additionally, the Legal Profession Board of Tasmania was involved in a matter concerning an Australian lawyer, indicating a regulatory or disciplinary proceeding. The court also dealt with a miscellaneous civil business matter involving Michael John Coleman and David Arthur Cuthbertson.

The legal issues in these cases likely pertained to the interpretation of civil law, the application of regulatory standards, and the resolution of ongoing litigation disputes. The court was required to consider the evidence presented, apply relevant legal principles, and make determinations based on the facts of each case. The proceedings involving the Legal Profession Board would have focused on whether the lawyer in question adhered to professional standards and whether any disciplinary action was warranted.

The court's reasoning and outcomes for each case were not detailed in the extract, but it is clear that the court conducted hearings and made judgments based on the evidence and arguments presented. The decisions would have been communicated to the parties involved, and any necessary orders or directives would have been issued. The court's handling of these cases reflects its role in resolving civil disputes, overseeing professional conduct, and ensuring justice is served within its jurisdiction.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established