Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 15 February 2019

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 15 FEBRUARY 2019

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Rodney Gene Croswell

For Directions Hearing
Joshua Robin Oakley
KLL
David James Fysh
TJR
JTT

For Plea
Cody David Brown
Alan Kenneth King
Danny Ian Cheeseman

2:00 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Russell John Nowoczynski
Craig Raymond Silva

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
Emilia Olive Harwood

For Directions Hearing via video link
CJW

For Plea via video link
Damien Wayne Smith

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Dion Brian Lumley

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions
Bal Bahadur Poudel

For Directions
Shayne William Jones
Ashley Edward Powell
Brendan Lee Jones
Robert George Greig
MLJ

Not before 10.15 a.m.
For Directions
Justin Paul Moore
Scott Darrell Rhodes
CBP
Nicholas John Barrett
Jarod Lee Kringle
Shane Andrew Fazackerley
Benjamin William Rae
David Tony Carver
Colin Arthur Mitchell
Peter Christian Kokavesis
Andrew Nathan Greeley
James Stuart Walker
Rahn Marcus Hansson
BPJ
Zac Royden Webb
Jason Lionel Webb

For Bail Consent
James Andrew Wright
MJL
JAJ
PJS
Joshua Phillip John King
Brady Peter Penneyston
Jordyn Jack Webb
James Stephen William Russon
Bilal Moutwari
Jacob Anthony Burdon
Jhye John Webb

Not before 11.30 a.m.
For Bail Application
CAB
Nathan Scott Booth
Joshua William Kay

2:00 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link to
Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie
Trent James Jones

2:15 p.m.
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Jayden Stephen Deverell

For Bail Variation
Shaune Henry Howlett

For Bail Application
Andrew Thompson
Michael Leonard Linnell
Kain Lewis Cowen

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. by video to Burnie

Civil Miscellaneous Business

1:00 p.m.
For Mention by telephone
Andrea and Leighton Ling
v
ADJAP PTY LTD
Trading As Stronach Constructions and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
CJR

10:00am For Backstop Trial
Chirack Mwanza Kadima

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARTIN
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am For Trial (Part Heard)
Toby John Della Valle
Shea Alex Gibbling

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.

For Directions Hearing via video link to
Risdon Prison Complex
RBR

For First Directions Hearing
KJD

For Directions Hearing
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos
Andrew James Sheean
Ryan Mansfield Willis Searle
Vanessa Rae Hardwick
Ryan Andrew Shackcloth
Kenneth John Kaye
Trevor Andrew Kempton
ED
Nicholas Michael Butcher

For Bail Application
Maddie Ann Charleston

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Dyson Noel Roughley
Todd Michael Walker
Hayley Jane Johnstone
DJV

For Plea
Luke Phillip Kennedy
Ray Alan Harvey

For Bail Consent
DGW
AM
Paul Sali
Steven Gibbs
John Hilsaca
Christine Joy Radford

Supreme Court, Alexander Street, Burnie

Before Justice ESTCOURT

Criminal Jurisdiction
2:00 p.m.

For Bail Application via video link from
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Trent James Jones

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involves multiple defendants who are facing criminal charges. The defendants in the case include Rodney Gene Croswell, Joshua Robin Oakley, Cody David Brown, Alan Kenneth King, Danny Ian Cheeseman, Russell John Nowoczynski, Craig Raymond Silva, Bal Bahadur Poudel, Shayne William Jones, Ashley Edward Powell, Brendan Lee Jones, Robert George Greig, Justin Paul Moore, Scott Darrell Rhodes, Nicholas John Barrett, Jarod Lee Kringle, Shane Andrew Fazackerley, Benjamin William Rae, David Tony Carver, Colin Arthur Mitchell, Peter Christian Kokavesis, Andrew Nathan Greeley, James Stuart Walker, Rahn Marcus Hansson, Zac Royden Webb, Jason Lionel Webb, Joshua Phillip John King, Brady Peter Penneyston, Jordyn Jack Webb, James Stephen William Russon, Bilal Moutwari, Jacob Anthony Burdon, Jhye John Webb, Nathan Scott Booth, Joshua William Kay, Trent James Jones, Chirack Mwanza Kadima, Toby John Della Valle, Shea Alex Gibbling, Elias Maffeking Kefalianos, Andrew James Sheean, Ryan Mansfield, Willis Searle, Vanessa Rae Hardwick, Ryan Andrew Shackcloth, Kenneth John Kaye, Trevor Andrew Kempton, Nicholas Michael Butcher, Maddie Ann Charleston, Dyson Noel Roughley, Todd Michael Walker, Hayley Jane Johnstone, Luke Phillip Kennedy, Ray Alan Harvey, and Paul Sali. The defendants are facing various charges and the court is required to decide on their legal issues.

The legal issues before the court include whether the defendants should be granted bail, variations to their existing bail conditions, or consent to their continued detention. The court also needs to decide on the directions to be taken in relation to the defendants' cases, including whether to proceed to trial or to hear further evidence. The court must consider the evidence presented by the prosecution and the defense, as well as the legal arguments put forward by the parties.

The court considered the evidence and legal arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defense. The court found that some of the defendants were to be granted bail, while others were to be detained pending further proceedings. The court also set directions for the defendants' cases, including the scheduling of further hearings and the allocation of resources. The court made orders in relation to the defendants' bail applications, variations to their existing bail conditions, and consent to their continued detention. The court also set directions for the defendants' cases, including the scheduling of further hearings and the allocation of resources.

The final orders of the court included granting bail to some of the defendants, varying the existing bail conditions of others, and denying consent to the continued detention of some defendants. The court also set directions for the defendants' cases, including the scheduling of further hearings and the allocation of resources. The court's orders were based on the evidence and legal arguments presented by both the prosecution and the defense, and were made in accordance with the relevant laws and legal principles.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established