Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 10 March 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 10 MARCH 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before THE FULL COURT
9:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Stirling Mathew Hookway
v
Tamzin Peta Hookway
(Part-Heard)

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Bail Application by video-link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Ricky Lee Smith-Towns

To Follow
Civil Jurisdiction
For Mention
Muhammad Ali Sayed

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as In Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Further Submissions

Gail Burnett
v
Fitzgerald and Browne

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15pm For Bail Application by video-link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Ricky Lee Smith-Towns

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Stirling Mathew Hookway brought a case against Tamzin Peta Hookway in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. The dispute concerns a family law matter, with the specifics of the case not detailed in the provided text. The hearing was part-heard, indicating that only a portion of the case was addressed during this session. The case was presided over by the Full Court in Hobart.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide pertain to family law, though the exact nature of the dispute is not specified. The Full Court was responsible for overseeing the proceedings and making decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The court's role was to interpret the relevant family law statutes and apply them to the facts of the case to reach a just outcome.

The court's reasoning and outcome are not detailed in the provided text. The Full Court would have considered the submissions from both parties, the applicable legal principles, and the evidence presented before delivering their decision. The final orders of the court, if any, were not recorded in the excerpt provided. Further details of the case would be required to understand the specific legal issues resolved and the court's final determination.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established