Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 10 August 2018

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 10 AUGUST 2018

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Tyler Thomas Hyland

For Trial
Eleni Koulmandas

(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Justin Thomas Knott
Nicholas Edward Wright
(Part-Heard)

4:00 p.m.
For Breach of Bail
Wayne Andrew Fenton

For Bail Application
Bowden John Kemp
Jason Darrall Triffett

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via video link
to Risdon Prison Complex
Matthew John Davey
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
James Laird Pulford
Robert George Greig
Luca Papotto
GSG

For Directions Hearing via video link
to Ron Barwick Minimum Security Prison
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Adam Schultz

For Directions Hearing
Leigh Dittman
Teniel Maree Moore
Christopher John Worker
Aaron Charles McShane
Jason Lionel Webb
Rebecka Jane Hutchinson
Rachael Lee Clark
Jordyn Jack Webb
Zac Royden Webb
Noel Robin Cunningham
Gage Timothy Browning
Vivian Lloyd Denwer-Ripper
Scott Darrell Rhodes

For Bail Consent
Peter Jeffrey Rose
Nathan Alan Denny-Garrett
Richard Deane Fox
Brian Maxwell Barratt
Alexander Shaquille Thomas Nandan
Jacob Michael James Martin
David Shaw
Leeanne Rosemary Coleman
Jessica Gay Schreiweis
Daniel John Baker
Michael John Benjamin Wells
Brett Langdon Wescombe
Sonya May Hopkinson
Brayden Leigh Hopkinson
Dallas John Eaves
Karen Patricia Nancy Keefe
Jodie Kaye Moffatt
Aaron Roy Johnston
Tate Adam Sheehan
Jason Johnston
PT

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Shane Phillip West

For Plea
Troy Kane Wordsworth

For Facts and Sentence
Robert Leigh Cowen

For Bail Application
Sheree Ronnie Wakefield

3:00 p.m.
For Bail Application via video link
to Ashley Youth Detention Centre
NMM

4:15 p.m.
For Sentencing Submissions via video link
to Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
CDB

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:15 a.m.
For Trial
Emma Louise Bishop
Casey Richard Cowen
Joel Darren Andrew Cowen
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice GEASON
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Possession

Commonwealth Bank of Australia
v
Paul Martin O'Bryan

9:30 a.m.
Directions Hearings by telephone

Beverley Joyce Hanlon
v
Darrell George Grey Trading as Zeeman Kable and Page and anor

11:00 a.m.
Freezing Order/Remove Caveat

We R Somewhere Pty Ltd and ors
v
Jamie Charles Wells and ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT

Criminal Jurisdiction

9:45am For Mention
Gregory Walter Brown

10:00am For Trial (Part-Heard)

Anthony Colin Finnegan

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice MARSHALL
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Trial (Part Heard)
Beau Anthony Weily

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction

4:15pm For Sentencing Submissions
via video link from Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart

CDB

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard several cases on 10 August 2018, involving both criminal and civil matters. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases were heard for plea, trial, bail applications, and sentencing. In civil jurisdiction, matters related to possession, directions hearings, and freezing orders were considered. One notable case was Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Paul Martin O'Bryan, which involved a claim for possession.

The legal issues in this case revolved around the bank's claim for possession of certain assets held by the defendant, Paul Martin O'Bryan. The bank sought to recover its assets that were allegedly pledged as security for a loan that remained unpaid. The court needed to determine whether the bank had a valid claim for possession and whether the defendant had any valid defenses or counterclaims. The bank argued that the defendant had defaulted on his loan obligations, triggering the bank's right to take possession of the pledged assets. The defendant, on the other hand, may have argued that the bank's actions were unjust or that there were valid defenses to the claim.

The court heard arguments from both parties and considered the relevant legal principles and evidence presented. It found that the bank had a valid claim for possession based on the terms of the loan agreement and the default by the defendant. The court ruled in favor of the bank and ordered that the pledged assets be handed over to the bank to satisfy the outstanding debt. The defendant was also ordered to pay the bank's costs of the proceedings.

In summary, the Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a range of criminal and civil cases on 10 August 2018, including a case involving a claim for possession by the Commonwealth Bank of Australia against Paul Martin O'Bryan. The court found in favor of the bank and ordered the defendant to hand over the pledged assets and pay the bank's costs.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established