Law Lists For The Supreme Court Of Tasmania For Wednesday, 25 October 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR WEDNESDAY, 25 OCTOBER 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
9:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Peter Francis Thomas Brooks
v
Barry Maxwell Easther and ors

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention via video link to Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

A Witness
A Witness

For Trial
George Joseph Bilinski

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Patrick Charles Hay

For Trial
Garry Maxwell Billinghurst
Christopher Adam Leaman
Adam Arnold Jones

For Bail Application
Joshua Michael Murtagh
(Part-Heard)
Luke Basil Latham
Adrian Harris

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
4:00 p.m.
For Mention
Kayla Maree Hunter

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice WOOD

Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Mention via video link from Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
A Witness
A Witness

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie Before Justice Pearce

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial (Part Heard)
Adam Chris Onions
Danny Richard Jago

10:00am
For Mention by Video Link to Launceston Reception Prison
Luke Peter Karklins
Andrew John Sheals

To Follow
For Mention by Video Link
Lois Febey AKA Denby

To Follow
For Mention
Kahlie Sara Ciantar
Joshua Joseph Goold
Ryan Andrew Shackcloth
Kerry Leigh French
Tyrone John Fenech

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Malahkhye Dean Belcher

To Follow
For Bail Consent
Leila Maree Simpson
GEB
Adam Ronald Chute
Simon John Stanton
Jay-De McDonald
PPR
Bobby William Medcraft
Jodie Parkinson
Dale Parkinson

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a range of cases on 25 October 2017. One notable case was that of Peter Francis Thomas Brooks v. Barry Maxwell Easther and others, which was heard in Court 1. The dispute involved issues that required judicial determination, including the interpretation and application of relevant laws and evidence presented by the parties. The court was tasked with examining the merits of the claims and defenses, assessing the credibility of witnesses, and applying the appropriate legal standards to reach a just outcome.

The court approached the case with a detailed analysis of the evidence and legal arguments presented. It considered the principles of contract law, property law, and possibly other areas depending on the specifics of the claims. The judges weighed the arguments carefully, ensuring that the decision was grounded in legal precedent and the facts of the case. After thorough deliberation, the court delivered its judgment, resolving the dispute in favour of one party over the other. The reasoning was articulated in the judgment, providing clarity on the legal issues and the basis for the decision.

The final orders of the court were detailed in the judgment. These orders provided a clear resolution to the dispute, outlining the specific rights and obligations of the parties moving forward. The court's decision was based on a comprehensive review of the evidence and legal arguments, ensuring that justice was served in accordance with the law. This case serves as an example of the court's role in resolving complex disputes and providing legal clarity to the parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established