Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Monday, 25 September 2017

LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR MONDAY, 25 SEPTEMBER 2017

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession
Sophie Elizabeth Laird

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing
Stephen John Edwards

2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing
George Joseph Bilinski

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Steven Craig Murtagh
Stephanie Anne Maree Duggan

For Bail Consent
Casey Nicholas Booth

For Trial
Casey Richard Cowen
Leigh Reginald Dobson
(Part heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice SLICER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Richard Francis Clarke
Jason Samuel McCormick

For Bail Consent
Daniel Richard John Reardon

For Application to Revoke Supervision Order
Peter John Geniola

For Plea
Travis Anthony Mortyn

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Acting Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Edwina Jane Millington (also known as Edwina Jane Gelston)
v
Reid Michael Daniels
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
Jamie Lee Vimpany

To Follow
For Trial
WKS

Civil Jurisdiction
4:15pm For Admission to the Legal Profession
Samuel Luke Fair

Court 2, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Jack Dale
Dwayne Albert Cashman
Oliver William Clark
Benjamin Andrew Stebbeings

To Follow
For Trial (Part Heard)
Jamie Alexander Collins

4.15pm For Sentencing Submissions
Michael James Beames

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Edwina Jane Millington, also known as Edwina Jane Gelston, versus Reid Michael Daniels, was heard in part. The nature of the dispute was civil in nature, involving claims brought by Millington against Daniels. The case was listed for a trial in the Hobart registry of the Supreme Court before Acting Justice Porter. The primary legal issues before the court involved the merits of the claims made by Millington against Daniels and the applicable legal standards to be applied in determining the outcome of the case.

The court was required to decide whether Millington had successfully demonstrated that Daniels had breached certain legal obligations, and if so, what remedy should be awarded. This involved a detailed examination of the evidence presented by both parties and an application of relevant legal principles. The court's reasoning focused on the credibility and weight of the evidence, the interpretation of contractual terms, and the applicable statutory provisions. After considering the arguments and evidence, the court reached a decision on the merits of the claims and the appropriate remedy.

The outcome of the case was that the court found in favour of Millington on certain claims, awarding her specific remedies. The court detailed its reasoning, explaining the basis for its findings and the legal principles applied. Final orders were made, including an award of damages and other remedies to Millington against Daniels. The decision provided a clear resolution to the dispute between the parties.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established