LAW LISTS FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FOR FRIDAY, 4 AUGUST 2017
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Matthew Allan Ward
For Trial
Stuart Malcom Allen
(Part-Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
DBL
(Part Heard)
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BRETT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Bail Application
Kenneth David Reynolds
Hayden Thompson
Harry McLean Dwarte
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.30am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Carly Ann Dekkers
Christopher John Humphreys
Malcolm Joshua Mayne
Caine Robert Richardson
Sean Gregory Richardson
Matthew Luke Williams
4:00pm For Application to Vary Bail
Timothy William Fowler
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Michael John Glover
Daniel James Allan Gibson
Harley Thomas Connlley
Daniel Tasman Mark
Russell Stuart Gall
Joshua Bruce Stephens
Danny Richard Jago
Adam Chris Onions
Malahkye Dean Belcher
For Bail Consent
Justin Lee Frake
Scott Phillip Strahan
Brian Douglas Williams
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law Lists for the Supreme Court of Tasmania for Friday, 4 August 2017 [2017] TASSCCourtlist 178
- Case
- [2017] TASSCCourtlist 178
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues addressed in these cases varied but generally involved the interpretation and application of criminal law principles, bail conditions, and procedural aspects of criminal trials. The court had to consider whether to grant or refuse bail, determine the appropriate conditions for bail, and ensure that the proceedings adhered to the legal standards and procedural fairness.
The reasoning and outcomes of the hearings were not detailed in the law lists. However, the court's role would involve examining evidence, assessing the risk posed by the accused, and ensuring that any decisions were in accordance with relevant legal precedents and statutes. The outcomes would depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case, including the nature of the alleged offences and the evidence presented.
No final orders were explicitly mentioned in the law lists, but the court's decisions would form the basis for any subsequent legal actions, appeals, or further proceedings in the cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.