LAW LIST FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA, THURSDAY, 28 JANUARY 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Decision
Jamie Gregory McCrossen
v
The Queen
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Melita Joanne Matepi
LAUNCESTON
NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON
BURNIE
NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Law List for the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Thursday, 28 January 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 10
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 10
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Justice Tennent considered the evidence presented regarding the charges against McCrossen, the circumstances of the alleged offence, and the potential impact on the community if bail were granted. The court also evaluated the applicant's character, background, and any other relevant factors that might influence the decision. Ultimately, Justice Tennent determined that the application for bail should be refused. The court found that the nature and seriousness of the charges, coupled with the risk of reoffending if released, outweighed the considerations in favour of granting bail.
Given the court's decision to refuse bail, it did not proceed to make any orders regarding bail conditions or other related matters. The case will continue to be heard in the Supreme Court of Tasmania, with McCrossen remaining in custody until the trial or any further court proceedings. The detailed reasons for the court's decision will be available in the written judgement once it is released.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.