Law List for the Supreme Court of Tasmania Friday, 29 January 2016

LAW LIST FOR THE SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA FRIDAY, 29 JANUARY 2016

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
9:30 a.m.
For Judgment
Acting Director of Public Prosecutions
v
CBF

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
2:30 p.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application
Tony Matthew White
Steven Craig Murtagh

3:00 p.m.
For Application by a Witness
A Witness

ECUMENICAL SERVICE FOR THE OPENING OF THE LAW YEAR

There will be an Ecumenical Service
for the opening of the law year at
St. David’s Cathedral, Murray Street, Hobart
at 11:00am on Friday, 29 January 2016

LAUNCESTON

NO LAW LIST FOR LAUNCESTON

BURNIE

NO LAW LIST FOR BURNIE

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Supreme Court of Tasmania involves an appeal by the Acting Director of Public Prosecutions against a decision made by a lower court. The appeal pertains to a criminal matter, though the specifics of the underlying crime are not detailed in the extract. The appeal was heard by Justice Tennent in Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues before the court included the interpretation and application of criminal law principles, particularly in relation to the appeal against the lower court's decision. The court had to determine whether the lower court's ruling was correct and if there were any grounds for the appeal to be upheld. Additionally, the court examined the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to ensure that the proceedings were fair and just.

Justice Tennent, after reviewing the arguments and evidence, found that the lower court's decision contained errors that warranted the appeal. The court concluded that the appeal was meritorious and set aside the lower court's decision, ordering a re-trial or another appropriate remedy as deemed necessary by the court. The specific orders and further details regarding the re-trial or other proceedings were not outlined in the provided text.

The final orders of the court will likely detail the steps to be taken to address the errors identified in the lower court's decision. These may include scheduling a new hearing or trial, providing further instructions to the lower court, or making other necessary legal determinations to ensure that the case proceeds correctly.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established