Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Amendment Act 2013 (NSW)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

An Act to amend the Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 to make provision for the role of a secondary law enforcement officer in controlled operations and to amend the Surveillance Devices Act 2007 to make further provision with respect to the use of listening devices in controlled operations.

1Name of Act

This Act is the Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Amendment Act 2013.

2Commencement

This Act commences on the date of assent to this Act.

Schedule 1Amendment of Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997 No 136[1]Section 3 Definitions

Omit the definition of principal law enforcement officer from section 3 (1).

Insert instead:

principal law enforcement officer for an authorised operation means the law enforcement officer who is identified by the authority for the operation as the principal law enforcement officer.

[2]Section 3 (1), definition of “secondary law enforcement officer”

Insert in alphabetical order:

secondary law enforcement officer for an authorised operation means the law enforcement officer who is identified by the authority for the operation as the secondary law enforcement officer.

[3]Section 5 Applications for authorities

Insert after section 5 (2A) (d):

  • (e)

    the names and ranks of the law enforcement officers nominated to be the principal law enforcement officer and the secondary law enforcement officer for the proposed operation.

  • [4]Section 8 Form of authority

    Omit section 8 (2) (b). Insert instead:

  • (b)

    must identify the principal law enforcement officer who is the person who is to conduct, and to have responsibility for, the operation, and

  • (b1)

    must identify the secondary law enforcement officer who is the person who is to conduct, and to have responsibility for, the operation whenever the principal law enforcement officer is unavailable to do so, and

  • [5]Section 8 (3)

    Insert “, (b1)” after “subsection (2) (b)”.

    [6]Section 10 Variation of authority

    Insert after section 10 (1) (b):

  • (b1)

    to provide for an alternative secondary law enforcement officer for the operation,

  • [7]Section 13B

    Insert after section 13A:

    13BFunctions of secondary law enforcement officer

    A function that is conferred on a principal law enforcement officer for an authorised operation under Part 3 or 3A or the regulations is taken to be conferred on the secondary law enforcement officer for the authorised operation whenever the principal law enforcement officer is unavailable to exercise the function.

    [8]Section 19 Exclusion of civil liability

    Insert “or the secondary law enforcement officer” after “officer” wherever occurring in section 19 (b) and (d) (ii).

    [9]Section 19

    Insert “secondary law enforcement officer,” after “principal law enforcement officer,”.

    [10]Section 20I Documents relating to cross-border controlled operations

    Omit “of a principal law enforcement officer of the agency” from section 20I (f).

    Insert instead “given to the chief executive officer”.

    [11]Section 20J Register relating to cross-border controlled operations

    Omit “the principal law enforcement officer for the operation made a report” from section 20J (2) (b) (viii).

    Insert instead “a report on the operation was made”.

    [12]Schedule 2 Savings and transitional provisions

    Insert at the end of clause 1 (1):

    any other Act that amends this Act

    Schedule 2Consequential amendment of Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Regulation 2012[1]Clause 12 Written notice to Ombudsman of variation of authority: section 21

    Insert “or secondary law enforcement officer” after “officer” in clause 12 (d).

    [2]Clause 13 Written notice to Ombudsman of receipt of report of authorised operation: section 21

    Omit “from the principal law enforcement officer for the operation” from clause 13 (a).

    [3]Schedule 1 Forms

    Insert after item 6 (a) in Form 1:

  • (a1)

    [Name], a law enforcement officer within the meaning of the Act (the secondary law enforcement officer), may conduct the controlled operation in accordance with the plan of the proposed operation accompanying the Application whenever the principal law enforcement officer is unavailable to conduct, and to have responsibility for, the operation.

  • [4]Schedule 1, Form 2

    Insert after item 6 (a):

  • (a1)

    [Name], a law enforcement officer within the meaning of the Act (the secondary law enforcement officer), may conduct the cross-border controlled operation:

    • (i)

      whenever the principal law enforcement officer is unavailable to conduct, and to have responsibility for, the operation, and

    • (ii)

      in accordance with the plan of the proposed operation accompanying the Application, in participating jurisdictions namely:

      [List the participating jurisdictions in which the controlled conduct is, or is likely, to be engaged in]

  • [5]Schedule 1, Form 3

    Insert after item 3 (b):

  • *(b1)

    to authorise [name] as the alternative secondary law enforcement officer for the controlled operation.

  • [6]Schedule 2 Code of conduct

    Omit “the principal law enforcement officer for the operation” from clause 4 (b).

    Insert instead “the law enforcement officer who is conducting, and has responsibility for, the operation”.

    Schedule 3Amendment of Surveillance Devices Act 2007 No 64

    Omit section 7 (4). Insert instead:

    (4)

    Subsection (1) does not apply to the use of a listening device to record, monitor or listen to a private conversation if:

    • (a)

      a party to the private conversation is a participant in an authorised operation and, in the case of a participant who is a law enforcement officer, is using an assumed name or assumed identity, and

    • (b)

      the person using the listening device is that participant or another participant in that authorised operation.

    (5)

    In this section:

    authorised operation and participant in an authorised operation have the same meanings as in the Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997.

    Note—

    The definition of participant in an authorised operation includes a civilian participant within the meaning of the Law Enforcement (Controlled Operations) Act 1997.

    Actions
    Download as PDF Download as Word Document


    Cases Citing This Decision

    0

    Cases Cited

    0

    Statutory Material Cited

    0