Laushing Investment Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1344
•18 August 2016
Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Laushing Investment Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1344 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 29 February 2016 Date of orders: 18 August 2016 Decision date: 18 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; multi-storey mixed use building with boarding house and commercial premises; urban design issues; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Laushing Investment Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Parramatta City Council (Respondent)Representation: Applicant: Ms J Reid (Barrister)
Solicitors:
Respondent: Mr A Seton (Solicitor)
Wiltshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Applicant)
Marsdens Law Group (Respondent)
File Number(s): 152440 of 2016 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is given leave to amend the development application by substituting the following plans as the plans relied upon for the purpose of the development application:
Drawing N0
Dated
A100, Cover page, Issue G, prepared by Gus Fares Architects
June 2016
A101, Site plan/ site analysis/ calculation, Issue G, prepared by Gus Fares Architects
June 2016
A103, Elevations/ sections, Issue G, prepared by Gus Fares Architects
June 2016
A104, Shadow Diagrams/ section/ communal living room solar access, Issue G, prepared by Gus Fares Architects
June 2016
A105, Area calculation/ street view, Issue G, prepared by Gus Fares Architects
June 2016
The appeal is upheld.
Development consent is granted to Development Application No. DA 60/2014 for the demolition of an existing commercial building and construction of a four (4) storey mixed use building containing commercial premises on the ground floor and a boarding house above subject to the conditions of consent annexed hereto and marked “A”.
The Court notes the agreement there be no order as to costs.
____________________________
Judy Fakes
Commissioner of the Court
152440.16 Fakes (C) (369 KB, pdf)
Decision last updated: 10 May 2018
0
0
1