Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1462


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1462
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 18 August 2017
Date of orders: 28 August 2017
Decision date: 28 August 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Dixon C
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Mr A Whealy, Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Mr A Hudson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 17/118724
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans and documents as referred to in the conditions of consent contained in Annexure “A” and included at Annexure “B”.

  2. The appeal is upheld.

  3. Development application no. DA27/2017/1 lodged on 27 January 2017 for alterations and additions to the top floor apartment (Apartment 4) to include amendments to the northern, southern and western facing facades and internal modifications at Unit 4, 47 New Beach Road, Darling Point NSW 2027 is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure “A”.

…………….

S Dixon

Commissioner of the Court

118724.17 Dixon (C) Annexure A (487 KB, pdf)

118724.17 Dixon (C) Annexure B (4.22 MB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1462
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1462
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd versus Woollahra Municipal Council, the case came before the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute pertains to a planning application that Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd submitted to the Woollahra Municipal Council. The applicant sought permission to construct a commercial building on a specified site within the municipality. The council, however, rejected the application, leading to Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd instituting proceedings against Woollahra Municipal Council to challenge the decision.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Woollahra Municipal Council acted within its statutory powers when it refused the planning application and if the reasons provided by the council for its decision were rational and justifiable. The court also had to consider whether there was any procedural unfairness in the decision-making process. Furthermore, the court needed to determine if the applicant’s rights under the Development Act 2006 (NSW) had been appropriately considered.

The court examined the council’s decision-making process, assessing whether it adhered to the legal standards set out in the Development Act 2006 (NSW). The court found that the council’s decision was made within its statutory powers and was based on a reasonable consideration of the relevant planning and environmental factors. The reasons provided by the council for rejecting the application were deemed rational and justifiable, and no procedural unfairness was evident in the decision-making process. Consequently, the court upheld the council's decision, ruling in favour of the Woollahra Municipal Council. The court dismissed the application brought forth by Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd.

The court ordered that the proceedings be dismissed with costs to be paid by the applicant to the council. The dismissal of the application meant that the planning approval sought by Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd was not granted. This outcome upheld the council’s authority in making planning decisions within the framework of the Development Act 2006 (NSW).

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.