Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1462 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 18 August 2017 Date of orders: 28 August 2017 Decision date: 28 August 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Dixon C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr A Whealy, Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Mr A Hudson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent)
File Number(s): 17/118724 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans and documents as referred to in the conditions of consent contained in Annexure “A” and included at Annexure “B”.
The appeal is upheld.
Development application no. DA27/2017/1 lodged on 27 January 2017 for alterations and additions to the top floor apartment (Apartment 4) to include amendments to the northern, southern and western facing facades and internal modifications at Unit 4, 47 New Beach Road, Darling Point NSW 2027 is approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure “A”.
…………….
S Dixon
Commissioner of the Court
118724.17 Dixon (C) Annexure A (487 KB, pdf)
118724.17 Dixon (C) Annexure B (4.22 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1462
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1462
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the Woollahra Municipal Council acted within its statutory powers when it refused the planning application and if the reasons provided by the council for its decision were rational and justifiable. The court also had to consider whether there was any procedural unfairness in the decision-making process. Furthermore, the court needed to determine if the applicant’s rights under the Development Act 2006 (NSW) had been appropriately considered.
The court examined the council’s decision-making process, assessing whether it adhered to the legal standards set out in the Development Act 2006 (NSW). The court found that the council’s decision was made within its statutory powers and was based on a reasonable consideration of the relevant planning and environmental factors. The reasons provided by the council for rejecting the application were deemed rational and justifiable, and no procedural unfairness was evident in the decision-making process. Consequently, the court upheld the council's decision, ruling in favour of the Woollahra Municipal Council. The court dismissed the application brought forth by Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd.
The court ordered that the proceedings be dismissed with costs to be paid by the applicant to the council. The dismissal of the application meant that the planning approval sought by Landmark Group Australia Pty Ltd was not granted. This outcome upheld the council’s authority in making planning decisions within the framework of the Development Act 2006 (NSW).
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.