Lancefield and Lancefield

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

LANCEFIELD & LANCEFIELD [2020] FamCAFC 194
FAMILY LAW – APPEAL – APPLICATION IN APPEAL – EXPEDITION – Where the father seeks to expedite his appeal against final parenting orders that substantially change primary care arrangements – Change in living arrangements to take place six months hence – Where the mother and Independent Children’s Lawyer neutral on the application – Whether the matter should be afforded priority to the detriment of other cases – Where the nature of the appeal justified priority – Application granted.

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60CC, 94(2D)(j)

Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 12.10A

APPLICANT: Mr Lancefield
RESPONDENT: Ms Lancefield
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Acorn Lawyers
FILE NUMBER: WOC 562 of 2018
APPEAL NUMBER: EA 105 of 2020
DATE DELIVERED: 7 August 2020
PLACE DELIVERED: Sydney
PLACE HEARD: Sydney
JUDGMENT OF: Ryan J
HEARING DATE: 7 August 2020
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Federal Circuit Court of Australia
LOWER COURT JUDGMENT DATE: 29 June 2020
LOWER COURT MNC: [2020] FCCA 1674

REPRESENTATION

SOLICITOR FOR THE APPELLANT: Powe & White Family Lawyers
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Rossi Simicic Lawyers
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Acorn Lawyers

Orders

  1. That the Application in an Appeal for expedition filed 24 July 2020 be granted.

  2. That the appeal EA 105 of 2020 be listed for hearing before the Full Court at 10.00 am on 7 October 2020 or as otherwise directed by the Eastern Appeals Registrar.

  3. That the parties confer with the Eastern Appeals Registrar as to further directions in relation to the appeal.

  4. That the costs of the application are to be costs in the appeal.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Lancefield & Lancefield has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY

Appeal Number: EA 105 of 2020
File Number: WOC 562 of 2018

Mr Lancefield

Applicant

And

Ms Lancefield

Respondent

And

Independent Children’s Lawyer

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. By an Application in an Appeal filed 24 July 2020, Mr Lancefield (“the father”) seeks to expedite his appeal against final parenting orders made on 29 June 2020 (“the orders”) in proceedings between him and Ms Lancefield (“the mother”).  The orders relate to parties’ children, X, born in 2009 and, Y, born in 2011 (“the children”).

  2. Relevantly the orders under appeal provide:

    ·for the parties to have equal shared parental responsibility for the children (Order 1);

    ·until 23 December 2020, for the children to live with the father and spend time with the…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Lancefield and Lancefield and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] FamCAFC 194
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties in this case were Lancefield and Lancefield, who were involved in a dispute that was brought before the Court. The nature of the dispute was not explicitly stated in the text, but it was an appeal that was filed by the respondent in the matter. The appeal was heard before the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria. The court was required to decide on an application for expedition filed by the appellant in relation to the appeal.

The legal issues that the court had to decide involved the granting of the application for expedition, the listing of the appeal for hearing, and the allocation of costs. The appellant had filed an application for the appeal to be heard expeditiously, and the court had to determine whether this application should be granted. Additionally, the court had to decide on the appropriate time and date for the appeal to be heard before the Full Court. Finally, the court had to determine the allocation of costs for the application.

The court found that the application for expedition should be granted, and the appeal should be listed for hearing before the Full Court at 10.00 am on 7 October 2020. The parties were directed to confer with the Eastern Appeals Registrar as to further directions in relation to the appeal. The court also determined that the costs of the application were to be costs in the appeal. The form of the order was subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the Application in an Appeal for expedition filed 24 July 2020 be granted.

2.

That the appeal EA 105 of 2020 be listed for hearing before the Full Court at 10.00 am on 7 October 2020 or as otherwise directed by the Eastern Appeals Registrar.

3.

That the parties confer with the Eastern Appeals Registrar as to further directions in relation to the appeal.

4.

That the costs of the application are to be costs in the appeal.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.