[2013] FWCA 8797 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Laminex Group Pty Ltd T/A The Laminex Group
(AG2013/11094)
THE LAMINEX GROUP ROCKHAMPTON BRANCH AGREEMENT 2013-2016
Timber and paper products industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 18 NOVEMBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the The Laminex Group Rockhampton Branch Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as The Laminex Group Rockhampton Branch Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 25 November 2013. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is23 November 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code J, AE405257 PR544317>
- AGLC
- Laminex Group Pty Ltd T/A The Laminex Group [2013] FWCA 8797
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8797
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the FWC was whether the proposed agreement adequately covered all necessary terms and conditions of employment as required by section 227 of the Fair Work Act. The FWC needed to determine if the agreement was appropriately negotiated and if it complied with the standards set by the Act. Additionally, the FWC examined whether the agreement provided fair terms for employees and did not undermine existing enterprise agreements or awards.
The FWC found that the agreement was appropriately negotiated and met the necessary standards. It determined that the agreement provided fair terms and conditions for employees and did not adversely affect existing agreements or awards. The FWC concluded that the agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act and approved it accordingly. The decision was based on the comprehensive nature of the agreement, its fairness to all parties involved, and its compliance with statutory requirements.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.