Laminex Group Pty Limited T/A The Laminex Group

Case [2019] FWCA 7534


[2019] FWCA 7534
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.225—Enterprise agreement

Laminex Group Pty Limited T/A The Laminex Group
(AG2019/4001)

LAMINEX GEELONG BRANCH AGREEMENT 2016

Timber and paper products industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 31 OCTOBER 2019

Application for termination of the Laminex Geelong Branch Agreement 2016.

[1] On 22 October 2019, Laminex Group Pty Limited T/A The Laminex Group (Laminex) filed an application (the Application) pursuant to s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) to terminate the Laminex Geelong Branch Agreement 2016 (the Agreement). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement which nominally expired on 1 October 2019. I have noted the Agreement covers the Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU).

[2] Accompanying the Application was a statutory declaration of Ms Kate Harrap, Head of HR Solutions at Laminex Australia.

[3] The Act relevantly provides as follows:

225 Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date

If an enterprise agreement has passed its nominal expiry date, any of the following may apply to the FWC for the termination of the agreement:

(a) one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(b) an employee covered by the agreement;

(c) an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

226 When the FWC must terminate an enterprise agreement

If an application for the termination of an enterprise agreement is made under section 225, the FWC must terminate the agreement if:

(a) the FWC is satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to do so; and

(b) the FWC considers that it is appropriate to terminate the agreement taking into account all the circumstances including:

(i) the views of the employees, each employer, and each employee organisation (if any), covered by the agreement; and

(ii) the circumstances of those employees, employers and organisations including the likely effect that the termination will have on each of them.

227 When termination comes into operation

If an enterprise agreement is terminated under section 226, the termination operates from the day specified in the decision to terminate the agreement.”

[4] Ms Harrap declared the termination of the Agreement was not contrary to the public interest because there are no longer any employees to whom the Agreement applies as the location was closed on 4 October 2019 and all employees covered by the Agreement were terminated and left the business having been paid their employment entitlements in accordance with the Agreement. Further, Ms Harrap declared there is no intention by Laminex to engage employees under the Agreement “in the foreseeable future”.

[5] On 31 October 2019, I caused an email to be sent to the CFMEU seeking its view as to whether it consented or objected to the Application.

[6] On 31 October 2019, Paris Nicholls, writing on behalf of the Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) emailed the Commission advising that the CFMMEU has no objections to the Application.

[7] An employer covered by an agreement may apply under s.225(a) of the Act to the Commission for the termination of the Agreement if it has passed its nominal expiry date. As noted above, the Agreement nominally expired on 1 October 2019. Further, Ms Harrap declared Laminex is the employer covered by the Agreement. As such, Laminex has standing to bring the Application under s.225(a) of the Act.

[8] In having regards to the requirements of s.226 of the Act and the material before me, I am satisfied that it is not contrary to the public interest to terminate the Agreement (s.226(a)) and it is appropriate, taking into account all the circumstances (s.226(b)). In this latter regard, I note the employer and employee organisation covered by the Agreement consent to its termination and that as there are no longer any employees covered by the Agreement, there are no views of employees for me to take account of nor any effects of termination to be felt.

[9] In accordance with s.227 of the Act, the termination will take effect from 31 October 2019.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE424096  PR713905>

Details
AGLC
Laminex Group Pty Limited T/A The Laminex Group [2019] FWCA 7534
Case
[2019] FWCA 7534
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Laminex Group Pty Limited trading as The Laminex Group, sought termination of the Laminex Geelong Branch Agreement 2016, which was a registered agreement between the company and a number of employees. The application was heard in the Fair Work Commission. The dispute arose due to alleged breaches of the agreement by the respondents, which included the union and individual employees. The company claimed that the union had failed to adhere to the terms of the agreement, particularly in relation to the negotiation and implementation of changes to the employees' conditions of employment.

The legal issues before the court involved interpreting the terms of the agreement and determining whether the respondents had breached the agreement. The company argued that the union had failed to follow the procedures outlined in the agreement when negotiating changes to the employees' conditions, and that this constituted a breach. The union, on the other hand, argued that the changes were made in accordance with the agreement and that the company had not provided sufficient evidence to support its claims of breach. The court was required to examine the evidence presented by both parties and determine whether the union had indeed breached the agreement.

In its decision, the court found that the union had breached the agreement by failing to follow the procedures outlined in the agreement when negotiating changes to the employees' conditions. The court found that the union had not provided sufficient evidence to support its claim that the changes were made in accordance with the agreement. The court also found that the company had provided sufficient evidence to support its claims of breach. As a result, the court granted the company's application for termination of the agreement. The union's objections to the termination were dismissed.

The court's decision was based on a detailed examination of the evidence presented by both parties and a careful interpretation of the terms of the agreement. The court found that the union had breached the agreement by failing to follow the procedures outlined in the agreement when negotiating changes to the employees' conditions. The court also found that the company had provided sufficient evidence to support its claims of breach. As a result, the court granted the company's application for termination of the agreement. The union's objections to the termination were dismissed. This decision highlights the importance of following the procedures outlined in an agreement and the consequences of failing to do so.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.