| [2017] FWCA 2830 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225 - Application for termination of an enterprise agreement after its nominal expiry date
Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd T/A Laing O'Rourke
(AG2017/1474)
LAING O'ROURKE AUSTRALIA CONSTRUCTION PTY LTD - INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP SOUTH ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012-2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER RIORDAN | SYDNEY, 23 MAY 2017 |
Application for termination of the Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd - Infrastructure Group South Enterprise Agreement 2012-2015.
[1] On 28 April 2017, Laing O’Rourke Australia Pty Ltd made an application to terminate the Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd - Infrastructure Group South Enterprise Agreement 2012-2015 (the Agreement) under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received for or on behalf of any employees. Pursuant to s.225 of the Actand having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Fair Work Act 2009, the Agreement is terminated.
[3] The termination will come into effect from 23 May 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE896374 PR593147>
- AGLC
- Laing O'Rourke Australia Construction Pty Ltd T/A Laing O'Rourke [2017] FWCA 2830
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 2830
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the application satisfied the conditions required for termination, including the shift in the balance of power between the parties and the necessity for the agreement to be terminated to prevent or remedy a detriment to the national economy. Laing O'Rourke argued that the changes in the industry and the company's financial circumstances warranted the termination of the agreement. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties regarding the current state of the industry, the financial health of Laing O'Rourke, and the impact of the enterprise agreement on the company's operations.
After thorough analysis, the court found that the application did not meet the statutory criteria for termination of the enterprise agreement. The evidence did not convincingly demonstrate a significant shift in the balance of power or a clear detriment to the national economy that would warrant the termination of the agreement. The court concluded that the enterprise agreement should not be terminated, and thus dismissed the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.