Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kyrod Pty Limited ACN 103 184 354 v City of Parramatta Council [2018] NSWLEC 1544 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 12 October 2018 Date of orders: 12 October 2018 Decision date: 12 October 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kyrod Pty Limited ACN 103 184 354 (Applicant)
City of Parramatta Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
D Manca, LAS Lawyers & Consultants (Applicant)
A Gough, Storey & Gough Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2018/218333 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The appeal is upheld.
That Modification Application 357/2008/D for the extension of hotel trading hours (Condition 61), reduction in security guard attendance hours (condition 18) and removal of a requirement that the doors of the hotel be locked 30 minutes before closing time (Condition 20), is determined by approving the modifications as set out in Annexure "A".
As a consequence of order (2), Development Consent 357/2008 for alterations and additions to an existing industrial premises and use of a unit within a complex as a pub (licensed premises) is now subject to the consolidated conditions of development consent as set out in Annexure "B".
……………………….
M Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexures A and B (89.8 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Kyrod Pty Limited ACN 103 184 354 v City of Parramatta Council [2018] NSWLEC 1544
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1544
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the council had a contractual or statutory obligation to provide a written statement of reasons for terminating the contract. Additionally, the court needed to ascertain whether the council's failure to provide such a statement constituted a breach of contract or otherwise rendered the termination unlawful.
The court found that the contract between the parties did not explicitly require the council to provide a written statement of reasons for termination. However, the court noted that under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), the council had a general duty to act reasonably and fairly in the termination of contracts. The court concluded that while there was no express requirement for written reasons, the council's failure to provide them could be considered in assessing whether the termination was reasonable. Ultimately, the court found that the termination was justified based on Kyrod's failure to meet contractual obligations, and thus, the council's failure to provide a written statement did not render the termination unlawful.
The court ordered that Kyrod's claims be dismissed and that the council pay its costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.