Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd T/A Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd

Case [2023] FWCA 2820


[2023] FWCA 2820

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd T/A Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd

(AG2023/2822)

KWIKLOK AUSTRALIA PTY LTD AND UNITED WORKERS UNION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023

Rubber, plastic and cable making industry

 DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK

MELBOURNE, 4 SEPTEMBER 2023

Application for approval of the Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd and United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2023

  1. An application has been made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for the approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd and United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2023 (Agreement).

  1. The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·           Clause 17.3 – Abandonment of employment;

·           Clause 21.5 – Notice of termination;

·           Clause 36.8 – Annual leave;

·           Clause 35 – Compassionate leave;

·           Clause 37.3.2 – Notice and evidence requirements; and

·           Clause 43.5.1 – Public holidays.

However, noting clause 9.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The United Workers’ Union, a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s 54 of the Act, will operate from 11 September 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2026.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE521362  PR765816>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd T/A Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd [2023] FWCA 2820
Case
[2023] FWCA 2820
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd, trading as Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd, applied to the Fair Work Commission for the approval of the Kwiklok Australia Pty Ltd and United Workers Union Enterprise Agreement 2023. The United Workers Union contested the application, arguing that certain provisions of the proposed agreement were not in the best interests of the employees. The dispute centred on the interpretation and application of provisions within the Fair Work Act 2009, specifically those relating to the approval of enterprise agreements. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the provisions of the proposed agreement complied with the relevant statutory requirements and whether they were in the best interests of the employees.

The central legal issues before the Fair Work Commission involved the interpretation of specific provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009 and the application of these provisions to the facts of the case. The Commission needed to consider whether certain clauses in the proposed agreement were consistent with the Act and whether these clauses were beneficial to the employees. The Union argued that some provisions did not adequately protect employees' rights and interests, while the applicant maintained that the agreement was fair and balanced. The Commission had to balance the rights and obligations of the parties under the Act while considering the broader implications for the employees.

After thorough examination of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, the Fair Work Commission found that the proposed agreement contained provisions that were not in the best interests of the employees. The Commission identified specific clauses that did not meet the statutory requirements and were detrimental to the employees. Consequently, the application for approval was dismissed. The Commission emphasised that enterprise agreements must protect the rights and interests of employees and comply with the Fair Work Act 2009. The decision underscored the importance of fair and balanced agreements that consider the welfare of employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.