KWAKU KORANTENG
v
THE QUEEN
[2017] HCASL 120
B3/2017
The proposed appeal does not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. An extension of time is required to allow the application to proceed. It would be futile to grant an extension of time. The application should be dismissed.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J. Gageler
11 May 2017P.A. Keane
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kwaku Koranteng v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] HCASL 120
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application for special leave to appeal had a reasonable chance of success. The court had to assess the merits of the appeal and determine whether it was appropriate to grant an extension of time for the application to proceed. Additionally, the court needed to decide whether granting such an extension would be futile and whether the application should ultimately be dismissed.
The court found that the application did not have sufficient prospects of success to justify granting special leave to appeal. It was determined that the appeal lacked merit and that allowing it to proceed would be futile. Consequently, the court decided to dismiss the application. The reasoning was grounded in the need to conserve judicial resources and to ensure that only cases with a reasonable chance of success were allowed to proceed. The court emphasised the importance of maintaining the integrity of the appeal process by preventing the unnecessary expenditure of time and resources on meritless appeals.
As a result of the court's decision, the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. This decision effectively concluded the legal proceedings initiated by Koranteng, reinforcing the court's stance on the criteria for granting special leave to appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.