Kwaku Koranteng v The Queen

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

KWAKU KORANTENG

v

THE QUEEN

[2017] HCASL 120
B3/2017

  1. The proposed appeal does not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal.  An extension of time is required to allow the application to proceed.  It would be futile to grant an extension of time.  The application should be dismissed. 

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

S.J. Gageler
11 May 2017
P.A. Keane
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Kwaku Koranteng v The Queen and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] HCASL 120
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Kwaku Koranteng was involved in a legal dispute with the Crown, culminating in a decision by the High Court of Australia. The case pertained to an appeal against the dismissal of an application for special leave to appeal. Koranteng sought to challenge the outcome of a decision made by a lower court. The nature of the dispute was whether the application for special leave to appeal had sufficient merit to warrant consideration by the High Court.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the application for special leave to appeal had a reasonable chance of success. The court had to assess the merits of the appeal and determine whether it was appropriate to grant an extension of time for the application to proceed. Additionally, the court needed to decide whether granting such an extension would be futile and whether the application should ultimately be dismissed.

The court found that the application did not have sufficient prospects of success to justify granting special leave to appeal. It was determined that the appeal lacked merit and that allowing it to proceed would be futile. Consequently, the court decided to dismiss the application. The reasoning was grounded in the need to conserve judicial resources and to ensure that only cases with a reasonable chance of success were allowed to proceed. The court emphasised the importance of maintaining the integrity of the appeal process by preventing the unnecessary expenditure of time and resources on meritless appeals.

As a result of the court's decision, the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application. This decision effectively concluded the legal proceedings initiated by Koranteng, reinforcing the court's stance on the criteria for granting special leave to appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.