Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kritharas v City of Canada Bay Council [2016] NSWLEC 1136 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 1 March & 1 April 2016 Date of orders: 12 April 2016 Decision date: 12 April 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Morris C Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Nick Kritharas (Applicant)
City of Canada Bay Council (Respondent)Representation: Mr V Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicant)
Mr P Jackson, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 11240 of 2015 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement were made on the date recorded on those orders. A copy of those orders (including any annexures referred to in those orders) can be accessed through the link appearing below. The date of the orders appears on the first page of the orders.
…………….
Commissioner Morris
11240 of 2015 12 April 2016 (81.6 KB, pdf)
11240 of 2015 Morris (C) (360 KB, pdf)
11240 of 2015 Morris_24 Fremont Street Final Agreed S34 DA Set_160324 (3.00 MB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Kritharas v City of Canada Bay Council [2016] NSWLEC 1136
- Case
- [2016] NSWLEC 1136
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the court involved the interpretation of statutory provisions and the principles of administrative law, particularly the scope of judicial review in relation to council decisions. Specifically, the court had to determine whether the council's decision was lawful, reasonable, and based on the correct application of the planning laws. The court also needed to assess whether the council had properly considered all relevant factors and exercised its discretion in a manner that was not irrational or unjust.
The court examined the council's decision-making process and the evidence presented before it, focusing on the application of the relevant statutory provisions and the principles of administrative law. The court found that the council had indeed exercised its discretion in a manner that was not irrational or unjust, and that it had properly considered all relevant factors. The decision was made in accordance with the law and was thus upheld. Consequently, the plaintiff's application for judicial review was dismissed.
The final orders of the court were that the plaintiff's application for judicial review was dismissed, with no orders for costs. The decision of the City of Canada Bay Council denying the development application was upheld as lawful, reasonable, and in accordance with the relevant planning laws.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.