FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd, in the matter of Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 1609
File number: NSD 218 of 2017 Judge: YATES J Date of judgment: 21 December 2017 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – reasonable remuneration of administrators and liquidators under invalid appointments – referee appointed – report adopted in whole Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 54A
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 28.67
Registry: New South Wales Division: General Division National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 6 Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Mr M Mathas of Norton Rose Fulbright Australia ORDERS
NSD 218 of 2017 IN THE MATTER OF KREAB GAVIN ANDERSON (AUSTRALIA) LTD ARBN 003 287 643
KREAB GAVIN ANDERSON (AUSTRALIA) LTD ARBN 003 287 643
Plaintiff
JUDGE:
YATES J
DATE OF ORDER:
21 DECEMBER 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Compliance with r 2.2(2) of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) be dispensed with for the purpose of the applicants seeking Order 2 hereof.
2.The report of the New South Wales District Registrar dated 14 December 2017, given pursuant to Order 2 made on 8 December 2017, be adopted in whole.
3.The remuneration of the applicants, Simon John Thorn and Bradley John Tonks, in accordance with the declaration made on 8 December 2017, be determined in the sum of $104,165.00.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
YATES J:
On 8 December 2017, I made a declaration that the applicants, Simon John Thorn and Bradley John Tonks, are entitled to reasonable remuneration for the work carried out by them, including by their partners and staff, when purporting to act as administrators of the plaintiff in the period from 6 December 2016, and in purporting to act as liquidators in a creditors’ voluntary winding up of the plaintiff in the period from 18 January 2017, up to the time of their appointment as provisional liquidators of the plaintiff on 21 February 2017.
I also made an order that, pursuant to s 54A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the New South Wales District Registrar of the Court (the District Registrar) be appointed as referee to determine the reasonable remuneration of the applicants, as declared: Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd, in the matter of Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 1473.
The District Registrar has now provided a report. In that report, and for the reasons given, he has determined that the reasonable remuneration of the applicants when purporting to act as administrators from 6 December 2016 is $90,597.50, and that the reasonable remuneration of the applicants when purporting to act as liquidators in a creditors’ voluntary winding up from 18 January 2017 is $13,567.50 (the report).
In correspondence with my Chambers (email 20 December 2017), the applicants, through their solicitor, now ask the Court to adopt the report in whole, pursuant to r 28.67(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth). I am prepared to act on that request without the need for the filing of an interlocutory process seeking an order for adoption.
I have considered the report, which I have now marked as Exhibit B, and am prepared to adopt it.
I will make an order that the remuneration of the applicants, in accordance with the declaration made on 8 December 2017, be determined in the sum of $104,165.00.
I certify that the preceding six (6) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Yates. Associate:
Dated: 21 December 2017
- AGLC
- Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd, in the matter of Kreab Gavin Anderson (Australia) Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 1609
- Case
- [2017] FCA 1609
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the administrators and liquidators could be compensated for their services despite the invalid appointments, and if so, the appropriate amount of remuneration. The court had to balance the need to protect the integrity of the corporate appointment process with the practical necessity of ensuring that those who acted in the best interests of the company were not left without compensation.
The court adopted the report of the New South Wales District Registrar, which recommended that the administrators and liquidators be compensated for their efforts. It reasoned that while the appointments were invalid, the actions taken by Thorn and Tonks were in the best interest of the company and its stakeholders. The court found that it was in the interests of justice to compensate them for their work. The sum of $104,165.00 was determined as the appropriate remuneration, reflecting the efforts and expertise provided.
The final orders made by the court included dispensing with the need for compliance with a specific rule of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000, adopting the Registrar’s report in full, and setting the remuneration of Thorn and Tonks at $104,165.00. The court's decision aimed to uphold the integrity of the corporate process while also recognising the valuable work done by the administrators and liquidators.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Compliance with r 2.2(2) of the Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000 (Cth) be dispensed with for the purpose of the applicants seeking Order 2 hereof.
2. The report of the New South Wales District Registrar dated 14 December 2017, given pursuant to Order 2 made on 8 December 2017, be adopted in whole.
3. The remuneration of the applicants, Simon John Thorn and Bradley John Tonks, in accordance with the declaration made on 8 December 2017, be determined in the sum of $104,165.00.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.