KRAMER v WORKERS REHABILITATION
& COMPENSATION CORPORATION
[1998] SASC 6910
Full Court
Coram: Millhouse J, Olsson & Debelle JJ
MILLHOUSE J
There is an application for leave to appeal to this court. It has been considered in private by the present quorum and in our view there is no possibility of the appellants being able successfully to argue the appeal. For that reason the application is refused. I direct that the parties be advised of this direction and be provided with the record of what has occurred today.
- AGLC
- Kramer v Workers Rehabilitation & Comp Corporation No. Scgrg-98-1092 Judgment No. S6910 [1998] SASC 6910
- Case
- [1998] SASC 6910
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court revolved around whether the applicants had grounds to appeal the decision and if they could successfully argue their case. The applicants needed to demonstrate that the lower court's decision contained significant errors that warranted an appeal. The respondents, on the other hand, needed to show that the decision was sound and that an appeal was not justified.
Upon reviewing the matter, the court found that the applicants were unlikely to succeed in their appeal. The Full Court, consisting of Millhouse J, Olsson, and Debelle JJ, concluded that there was no possibility of the appellants successfully arguing their appeal. As a result, the application for leave to appeal was refused. The court also directed that the parties be informed of this decision and provided with the record of the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.