Legal Research
Cases
Kourtis v Wheelers Hill Primary School Council

Kourtis v Wheelers Hill Primary School Council

Case [2020] VMC 10

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Kourtis v Wheelers Hill Primary School Council [2020] VMC 10
Case: [2020] VMC 10
Decision Date: 5 May 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Kourtis v Wheelers Hill Primary School Council [2020] VMC 10

Most Recent Citation

Singh v Securecorp [2025] VMC 2

Cases Citing This Decision

Singh v Securecorp [2025] VMC 2
Citation 1 (Para 4)

…The defendant referred to this Court’s decision in Kourtis v Wheelers Hill Primary School ( [2020] VMC 10 (5 May 2020) ) and the review of the cases at [165] to [176] and the following at [176] : “The essential enquiry remains whether, at the time of the incident, there was the relevant nexus: “…between the rele…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Sednaoui v Amac Corrosion Protection Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 66
Citation 1

…re not conclusive of the matter. 159.The plaintiff properly makes this concession given the decision of Sednaouni v Amac Corrosion Protection Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 66 . I refer to the following passage at [65]: “Ansett v Taylor is not authority for any such propositions of law. The observation in Ansett v Taylor th…
Victorian WorkCover Authority v Michaels [2009] VSCA 261
Citation 2

…171.The Court of Appeal in VWA v Michaels ([2009] VSCA 261(unreported, Supreme Court of Victoria, Court of Appeal, 17 November 2009 [12-16]) considered the situation of a lecturer who suffered injury while examining textbooks in a bookshop some days prior to starting an employment contract and stated at [16]: “Alt…
Ansett Australia Ltd v Taylor [2006] VSCA 171
Citation 3

…158.The plaintiff relies upon Ansett Australia Ltd v Taylor [2006] VSCA 171 with respect to the acceptance of the claims and asserts that the acceptance of the claims is an admission of some significance. That is correct. However, the plaintiff does concede that in themselves, these acceptances are not conclusive…
Henderson v Commissioner of Railways (WA) [1937] HCA 67
Citation 4

…(1937) 58 CLR 281 at 294. (b) Humphrey Earl Limited v. Speechley (1951) 84 CLR 126 at 133 and 134 . (c) Park v. Peach (1967) VR 558 at 565.…
Vassallo v Intermotor Sales [2017] VMC 16
Citation 5

…Court has ‘…exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into, hear and determine any question or matter…’ . 179.In Vassallo v Intermotor Sales [2017] VMC 16 , Magistrate Wright at [146] said: “…s.264(2) must be given some meaning. It allows the parties, more particularly the VWA to have a court deal with issues that may…

AI Chat coming soon