FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Korovata v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1446
MIGRATION – application for Temporary Social Sporting visa – applicant provided address for service on application for review before Migration Review Tribunal – letter advising of hearing not sent to address for service – letter advised hearing would be by telephone – requested applicant to provide a contact telephone number – letter did not advise place at which hearing would take place – whether Migration Review Tribunal failed to comply with procedures required by s 360 and s 360A of Migration Act 1958 – whether r 1.20 and Item 421 of Schedule 2 of the Migration Regulations 1994 requires that sponsor be approved by respondent – whether any utility in setting aside decision – whether Migration Review Tribunal took into account irrelevant consideration
Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 360, 360A, 366, 379A
Migration Regulations 1994 r 1.20, Item 421 (Schedule 2)Rodwell v Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1992) 28 ALD 195 cited
IOWANI KOROVATA v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
N 1100 OF 2001
EMMETT J
28 SEPTEMBER 2001
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 1100 OF 2001
BETWEEN:
IOWANI KOROVATA
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND ANOR
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
28 SEPTEMBER 2001
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The decision of the Migration Review Tribunal of 22 June 2001 be set aside.
2.The matter be remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration according to law and in accordance with the Migration Act.
3. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the application.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 1100 OF 2001
BETWEEN:
IOWANI KOROVATA
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS AND ANOR
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE:
28 SEPTEMBER 2001
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
EMMETT J
The applicant is a national of Fiji. He entered Australia on 2 February 1994 on a Cultural/Social (Temporary) (Class TE) visa, subclass 421, which was granted to him so that he could participate in the Coca Cola World Sevens Tournament. Thereafter he periodically lodged applications for visas for further stays as a temporary resident. In each case the class of visa sought was subclass 421. On 12 October 1998 the applicant applied for a further subclass 421 visa. On 1 July 1999, a delegate of the respondent (“the Minister”) decided to refuse to grant the visa. On 28 July 1999, the applicant lodged an application for review of that decision by the Migration Review Tribunal (“the Tribunal”). On 22 June 2001 the Tribunal affirmed the decision not to grant a visa applied. On 20 July 2001 the applicant applied to this Court for an order of review of the decision of the Tribunal.
The amended application for review essentially discloses two complaints. Those complaints are based on several grounds in s 476(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (“the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Korovata v Minister for Immigration and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2001] FCA 1446
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The decision of the Migration Review Tribunal of 22 June 2001 be set aside.
2. The matter be remitted to the Tribunal for reconsideration according to law and in accordance with the Migration Act.
3. The respondent pay the applicant's costs of the application.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: EMMETT J
Full text does not contain this section.