Konchalowsky v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
Case
•
[2006] NSWADT 100
•04/06/2006
No judgment structure available for this case.
CITATION: Konchalowsky v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSWADT 100 DIVISION: Revenue Division PARTIES: APPLICANT
Natalie Maree Konchalowsky
RESPONDENT
Chief Commissioner of State RevenueFILE NUMBER: 056034 HEARING DATES: 28/10/05 SUBMISSIONS CLOSED: 10/28/2005
DATE OF DECISION:
04/06/2006BEFORE: Hole M - Judicial Member CATCHWORDS: Duties Act - First Home Plus Scheme - residence requirement MATTER FOR DECISION: Principal matter LEGISLATION CITED: Duties Act 1997
First Home Owner Grant Act 2000CASES CITED: Bates v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2004] NSW ADT 13
Scurry v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2006] NSWADT 29
Snow v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2) [2005] NSWADT 278REPRESENTATION: APPLICANT
RESPONDENT
In person
S Benjamin, solicitorORDERS: That the decision of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue is confirmed
FACTS
1 The applicant has applied for a review of the decision of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue to recall the First Home Owner’s Grant (“the Grant”) application no 053106 and revoke the First Home Plus stamp duty concession (“the concession”) application no 056034 in respect of her purchase of a home unit at Cronulla (“the property”). The applicant’s brother was a joint purchaser, he has not applied for a review of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue’s decision.
2 The facts and evidence in this matter are identical to the facts and evidence in 053106. The reasons set out in the decision on that application include the reasons in respect of this application.
ORDER
- That the decision of the Chief Commissioner of State Revenue is confirmed.
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
Scurry v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue
[2006] NSWADT 29
Snow v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue (No 2)
[2005] NSWADT 278