Komal (Migration)

[2022] AATA 2453

Komal (Migration) [2022] AATA 2453 (13 July 2022)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Miss  Komal

CASE NUMBER:  2207506

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2020/2281381

MEMBER:Namoi Dougall

DATE:13 July 2022

PLACE OF DECISION:  Sydney

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a).

Statement made on 13 July 2022 at 12:38pm

CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa – Subclass 485 (Temporary Graduate) – character test – criminal history statement – AFP national police certificate provided to tribunal – no disclosable court outcomes – decision made without hearing necessary – decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 65, 360(2)(a)
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), r 2.03AA(2)(a)

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs to refuse to grant the applicant a Skilled (Provisional) (Class VC) visa under s 65 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) (the Act). The applicant applied for the visa on 11 September 2020. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 2 May 2022.

2.    The delegate made the decision on the basis that evidence of a medical assessment was not provided as required to satisfy a criterion for the grant of the visa under the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

3.    On 2 November 2021, the Department requested an Australian Federal Police National Police Certificate.

4.    On 31 May 2022, the Tribunal received a National Police Certificate dated 26 May 2022 certifying that there are no disclosable Court outcomes. In light of the new evidence received, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion is met and has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

5.    In reaching its decision the Tribunal did not consider a hearing to be necessary, as it was able to find in favour of the applicant on the basis of the material before it, pursuant to s 360(2)(a) of the Act.

DECISION

6.    The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 485 visa:

·Regulation 2.03AA(2)(a).

Namoi Dougall
Member