FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| KOBYLINSKI & ANOR v WALKER | [2008] FMCA 89 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Leave to take fresh steps in proceedings – whether leave to be granted – sufficient complicity and multiplicity of claims – whether leave ought to be granted conditionally. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.58(3)(b), 109 |
| Fraser v Commonwealth of Taxation & Anor (1996) 69 FCR 99 Singh v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy & Anor [2007] FMCA 1367 |
| First Applicant: | ADRIAN JOHN KOBYLINSKI |
| Second Applicant: | ANNE MARIA KOBYLINSKI |
| Respondent: | GEOFFREY WALKER |
| File number: | PEG 221 of 2007 |
| Judgment of: | Lucev FM |
| Hearing date: | 25 January 2008 |
| Date of last submission: | 25 January 2008 |
| Delivered at: | Perth |
| Delivered on: | 25 January 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Duncan |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Gibson Lyons Lawyers |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mrs McKenzie |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | McKenzie and McKenzie |
ORDERS
Under section 58(3)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act the applicants have leave to take any further steps it considers necessary in proceeding 1893 of 2006 in the District Court of Western Australia, on the following conditions:
(A)that the applicants will not take further steps in the District Court proceedings without giving 7 days notice to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, provided that on each occasion it is necessary to take a further step this period may be varied by agreement with the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy;
(B)that the applicants will not oppose the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy being joined in the District Court proceedings at any time;
(C)that the applicants will hold the property of the respondent the subject of the District Court proceedings, or any monies of the Respondent received in the District Court proceedings, for the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy on behalf of the bankrupt estate of the respondent;
(D)that the applicants will notify the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy of any settlement proposed to be entered into in respect of the District Court proceedings concerning the property of the respondent and not enter into any such settlement unless consented to by the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy; and
The respondent pay the applicants’ costs of this application, if not agreed, to be taxed under 0.62 of the Federal Court Rules by a Registrar of this Court, and paid out of the respondent’s bankrupt estate in the priority fixed by s.109(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PERTH |
PEG 221 of 2007
| ADRIAN JOHN KOBYLINSKI |
First Applicant
| ANNE MARIA KOBYLINSKI |
Second Applicant
And
| GEOFFREY WALKER |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from transcript)
(As corrected)
This is an application under s.58(3)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) by which the applicants seek leave to continue proceedings in District Court action 1893 of 2006 against the respondent, Geoffrey Walker, and, if necessary, to join other parties an seek discovery. Copies of the application have been served on the respondent and on the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy.
The respondent became bankrupt on 14 May 2007, with total creditors, he says, of $303,700, of which $300,000 was…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Kobylinski & Anor v Walker and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] FMCA 89
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to decide whether the applicants should be allowed to take further steps in the District Court proceedings, and if so, under what conditions. The primary legal issues involved balancing the applicants' right to pursue their claims against the statutory rights of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, who represents the interests of the bankrupt estate. This required careful consideration of the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, particularly sections 58(3)(b) and the related rules concerning the handling of bankrupt estates.
In its reasoning, the court examined the statutory framework and found that the applicants could be granted leave to proceed under certain conditions. These included providing notice to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, allowing the Trustee to be joined in the proceedings, holding any recovered property for the benefit of the bankrupt estate, and requiring consent from the Trustee for any settlement. The court concluded that these conditions adequately protected the interests of the bankrupt estate while allowing the applicants to pursue their claims. Consequently, the court granted the applicants' leave to proceed under the specified conditions and ordered the respondent to pay the applicants' costs of the application, to be paid from the respondent's bankrupt estate.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Under section 58(3)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act the applicants have leave to take any further steps it considers necessary in proceeding 1893 of 2006 in the District Court of Western Australia, on the following conditions:
(A) that the applicants will not take further steps in the District Court proceedings without giving 7 days notice to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, provided that on each occasion it is necessary to take a further step this period may be varied by agreement with the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy;
(B) that the applicants will not oppose the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy being joined in the District Court proceedings at any time;
(C) that the applicants will hold the property of the respondent the subject of the District Court proceedings, or any monies of the Respondent received in the District Court proceedings, for the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy on behalf of the bankrupt estate of the respondent;
(D) that the applicants will notify the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy of any settlement proposed to be entered into in respect of the District Court proceedings concerning the property of the respondent and not enter into any such settlement unless consented to by the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy; and
2.
The respondent pay the applicants’ costs of this application, if not agreed, to be taxed under 0.62 of the Federal Court Rules by a Registrar of this Court, and paid out of the respondent’s bankrupt estate in the priority fixed by s.109(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.