Kobylinski & Anor v Walker

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

KOBYLINSKI & ANOR v WALKER [2008] FMCA 89
BANKRUPTCY – Leave to take fresh steps in proceedings – whether leave to be granted – sufficient complicity and multiplicity of claims – whether leave ought to be granted conditionally.
Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.58(3)(b), 109
Fraser v Commonwealth of Taxation & Anor  (1996) 69 FCR 99
Singh v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy & Anor [2007] FMCA 1367
First Applicant: ADRIAN JOHN KOBYLINSKI
Second Applicant: ANNE MARIA KOBYLINSKI
Respondent: GEOFFREY WALKER
File number: PEG 221 of 2007
Judgment of: Lucev FM
Hearing date: 25 January 2008
Date of last submission: 25 January 2008
Delivered at: Perth
Delivered on: 25 January 2008

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Duncan
Solicitors for the Applicant: Gibson Lyons Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent: Mrs McKenzie
Solicitors for the Respondent: McKenzie and McKenzie

ORDERS

  1. Under section 58(3)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act the applicants have leave to take any further steps it considers necessary in proceeding 1893 of 2006 in the District Court of Western Australia, on the following conditions:

    (A)that the applicants will not take further steps in the District Court proceedings without giving 7 days notice to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, provided that on each occasion it is necessary to take a further step this period may be varied by agreement with the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy;

    (B)that the applicants will not oppose the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy being joined in the District Court proceedings at any time;

    (C)that the applicants will hold the property of the respondent the subject of the District Court proceedings, or any monies of the Respondent received in the District Court proceedings, for the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy on behalf of the bankrupt estate of the respondent;

    (D)that the applicants will notify the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy of any settlement proposed to be entered into in respect of the District Court proceedings concerning the property of the respondent and not enter into any such settlement unless consented to by the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy; and

  2. The respondent pay the applicants’ costs of this application, if not agreed, to be taxed under 0.62 of the Federal Court Rules by a Registrar of this Court, and paid out of the respondent’s bankrupt estate in the priority fixed by s.109(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT
PERTH

PEG 221 of 2007

ADRIAN JOHN KOBYLINSKI

First Applicant

ANNE MARIA KOBYLINSKI

Second Applicant

And

GEOFFREY WALKER

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

(Revised from transcript)

(As corrected)

  1. This is an application under s.58(3)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) by which the applicants seek leave to continue proceedings in District Court action 1893 of 2006 against the respondent, Geoffrey Walker, and, if necessary, to join other parties an seek discovery. Copies of the application have been served on the respondent and on the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy.

  2. The respondent became bankrupt on 14 May 2007, with total creditors, he says, of $303,700, of which $300,000 was…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Kobylinski & Anor v Walker and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2008] FMCA 89
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Kobylinski & Anor v Walker involved the applicants, Kobylinski and another, seeking leave to proceed with further steps in a District Court proceeding against the respondent, Walker. The dispute centred on property and monies related to the respondent's bankrupt estate. The Federal Court was tasked with determining whether the applicants should be granted permission to proceed with the actions outlined in their application, subject to specific conditions that would safeguard the interests of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy.

The court had to decide whether the applicants should be allowed to take further steps in the District Court proceedings, and if so, under what conditions. The primary legal issues involved balancing the applicants' right to pursue their claims against the statutory rights of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, who represents the interests of the bankrupt estate. This required careful consideration of the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, particularly sections 58(3)(b) and the related rules concerning the handling of bankrupt estates.

In its reasoning, the court examined the statutory framework and found that the applicants could be granted leave to proceed under certain conditions. These included providing notice to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, allowing the Trustee to be joined in the proceedings, holding any recovered property for the benefit of the bankrupt estate, and requiring consent from the Trustee for any settlement. The court concluded that these conditions adequately protected the interests of the bankrupt estate while allowing the applicants to pursue their claims. Consequently, the court granted the applicants' leave to proceed under the specified conditions and ordered the respondent to pay the applicants' costs of the application, to be paid from the respondent's bankrupt estate.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Under section 58(3)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act the applicants have leave to take any further steps it considers necessary in proceeding 1893 of 2006 in the District Court of Western Australia, on the following conditions:

(A) that the applicants will not take further steps in the District Court proceedings without giving 7 days notice to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, provided that on each occasion it is necessary to take a further step this period may be varied by agreement with the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy;

(B) that the applicants will not oppose the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy being joined in the District Court proceedings at any time;

(C) that the applicants will hold the property of the respondent the subject of the District Court proceedings, or any monies of the Respondent received in the District Court proceedings, for the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy on behalf of the bankrupt estate of the respondent;

(D) that the applicants will notify the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy of any settlement proposed to be entered into in respect of the District Court proceedings concerning the property of the respondent and not enter into any such settlement unless consented to by the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy; and

2.

The respondent pay the applicants’ costs of this application, if not agreed, to be taxed under 0.62 of the Federal Court Rules by a Registrar of this Court, and paid out of the respondent’s bankrupt estate in the priority fixed by s.109(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.