Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited T/A Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited

Case [2023] FWCA 661


[2023] FWCA 661

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited T/A Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited

(AG2023/291)

Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited Pinkenba Enterprise Agreement 2023

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON

BRISBANE, 28 FEBRUARY 2023

Application for approval of the Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited Pinkenba Enterprise Agreement 2023

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited Pinkenba Enterprise Agreement 2023 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have a different Agreement title to the title of the Agreement submitted for approval. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(2) of the Act.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.

  1. Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·  Clause 25 – Compassionate Leave for still births/miscarriage

·  Clause 29.7– Public Holiday substitution may only occur by agreement between an employer and an employee (not by majority)

·  Clause 35 – Withholding of NES entitlements

However, noting clause 6.2 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Communication, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) and the Construction. Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU) have both lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the CEPU and the CFMMEU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 27 February 2027.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE519355  PR751278>

Details
AGLC
Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited T/A Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited [2023] FWCA 661
Case
[2023] FWCA 661
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited, trading as Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited, applied to the Fair Work Commission for approval of the Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited Pinkenba Enterprise Agreement 2023. The applicant sought to have the agreement, which outlines the terms and conditions of employment for employees at its Pinkenba site, approved under the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was made under section 231 of the Act, which allows for the registration of new enterprise agreements.

The legal issues before the court centred on whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and whether it had been made in good faith. The court also had to consider if the agreement contained any unfair terms, and if so, whether these could be disregarded under section 232 of the Act.

The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, and had been made in good faith. The Commission considered the parties' bargaining positions, the content of the agreement, and the process by which it was negotiated. While the Commission identified some terms that it considered to be potentially unfair, it determined that these could be disregarded under the Act, as they did not significantly impact the overall fairness of the agreement. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the Knauf Gypsum Pty Limited Pinkenba Enterprise Agreement 2023, registering it under section 179 of the Fair Work Act.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.